Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22853843›Full record

ReviewNutrition research reviews2012

Redefining the impact of nutrition on breast cancer incidence: is epigenetics involved?

Dorothy Teegarden, Isabelle Romieu, Sophie A Lelièvre

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nutrition research reviews, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 51 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Taking a chance on epigenetics.Frontiers in genetics · 2014
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Building risk-on-a-chip models to improve breast cancer risk assessment and prevention.Integrative biology : quantitative biosciences from nano to macro · 2013
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Dorothy TeegardenDepartment of Nutrition Sciences, Stone Hall, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907-1264, USA.
Isabelle Romieu
Sophie A Lelièvre
Center for Cancer Research · USCentre International de Recherche sur le Cancer · FRPurdue University West Lafayette · US

Funding

Interdisciplinary Cancer Prevention Research Internship ProgramR25CA128770 · NCI · PURDUE UNIVERSITY · PI TEEGARDEN, DOROTHY · 2008 to 2012
$1.5M
NuMA function in nonmalignant and malignant breast cellsR01CA112017 · NCI · PURDUE UNIVERSITY · PI LELIEVRE, SOPHIE A. · 2007 to 2012
$872k
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA112017NCI NIH HHS R01CA112017NCI NIH HHS R25 CA128770NCI NIH HHS R25CA128770
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Breast cancer incidence is rising worldwide with an increase in aggressive neoplasias in young women. Possible factors involved include lifestyle changes, notably diet that is known to make an impact on gene transcription. However, among dietary factors, there is sufficient support for only greater body weight and alcohol consumption whereas numerous studies revealing an impact of specific diets and nutrients on breast cancer risk show conflicting results. Also, little information is available from middle- and low-income countries. The diversity of gene expression profiles found in breast cancers indicates that transcription control is critical for the outcome of the disease. This suggests the need for studies on nutrients that affect epigenetic mechanisms of transcription, such as DNA methylation and post-translational modifications of histones. In the present review, a new examination of the relationship between diet and breast cancer based on transcription control is proposed in light of epidemiological, animal and clinical studies. The mechanisms underlying the impact of diets on breast cancer development and factors that impede reaching clear conclusions are discussed. Understanding the interaction between nutrition and epigenetics (gene expression control via chromatin structure) is critical in light of the influence of diet during early stages of mammary gland development on breast cancer risk, suggesting a persistent effect on gene expression as shown by the influence of certain nutrients on DNA methylation. Successful development of breast cancer prevention strategies will require appropriate models, identification of biological markers for rapid assessment of preventive interventions, and coordinated worldwide research to discern the effects of diet.

Indexed as

DietEpigenesis, GeneticGene Expression RegulationNutritional StatusTranscription, GeneticAnimalsBreast NeoplasmsDNA MethylationFemaleHumansIncidenceMammary Glands, HumanNucleoproteinsProtein Processing, Post-TranslationalNucleoproteins

Identifiers

PMID22853843
PMCPMC4090752
OpenAlexW2116223425

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.