Trial reportLeukemia & lymphoma2013
Addition of granulocyte macrophage colony stimulating factor does not improve response to early treatment of high-risk chronic lymphocytic leukemia with alemtuzumab and rituximab.
Trial report in Leukemia & lymphoma, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- A phase II randomized trial comparing standard and low dose rituximab combined with alemtuzumab as initial treatment of progressive chronic lymphocytic leukemia in older patients: a trial of the ECOG-ACRIN cancer research group (E1908).American journal of hematology · 2016Trial
- A phase II study of the combination of rituximab and granulocyte macrophage colony stimulating factor as treatment of patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia.Leukemia & lymphoma · 2015Trial
- Early treatment of high risk chronic lymphocytic leukemia with alemtuzumab, rituximab and poly-(1-6)-beta-glucotriosyl-(1-3)- beta-glucopyranose beta-glucan is well tolerated and achieves high complete remission rates.Leukemia & lymphoma · 2015Trial
- Chemoimmunotherapy for relapsed/refractory and progressive 17p13-deleted chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) combining pentostatin, alemtuzumab, and low-dose rituximab is effective and tolerable and limits loss of CD20 expression by circulating CLL cells.American journal of hematology · 2014Trial
- Fludarabine, cyclophosphamide and rituximab plus granulocyte macrophage colony-stimulating factor as frontline treatment for patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia.Leukemia & lymphoma · 2014Trial
- A phase I study of escalated dose subcutaneous alemtuzumab given weekly with rituximab in relapsed chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma.Haematologica · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Thirty-three previously untreated patients with high-risk chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) were treated before meeting standard criteria with alemtuzumab and rituximab. Granulocyte macrophage colony stimulating factor (GM-CSF) was added to the regimen to determine whether it would improve treatment efficacy without increasing toxicity. High risk was defined as at least one of the following: 17p13-; 11q22.3-; unmutated IGHV (or use of VH3-21) together with elevated expression of ZAP-70 and/or CD38. Treatment was subcutaneous GM-CSF 250 μg Monday-Wednesday-Friday for 6 weeks from day 1, subcutaneous alemtuzumab 3 mg-10 mg-30 mg from day 3 and then 30 mg Monday-Wednesday-Friday for 4 weeks, and intravenous rituximab (375 mg/m(2)/week) for 4 weeks from day 8. Patients received standard supportive care and were monitored weekly for cytomegalovirus (CMV) reactivation. Using standard criteria, 31 (94%) patients responded to treatment, with nine (27%) complete responses (one with persistent cytopenia) and nine (27%) nodular partial responses. Median progression-free survival was 13.0 months and time to next treatment was 33.5 months. No patient died during treatment, seven (21%) had grade 3-4 toxicities attributable to treatment, and 10 (30%) had CMV viremia. Addition of GM-CSF to therapy with alemtuzumab and rituximab decreased treatment efficacy and increased the rate of CMV reactivation compared to a historical control.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.