Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22853318›Full record

ReviewClimacteric : the journal of the International Menopause Society2012

The evolution of selective estrogen receptor modulators in osteoporosis therapy.

P Hadji

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Climacteric : the journal of the International Menopause Society, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 59 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Administration of Young Coconut (Diseases (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  10. Review
  11. The crosstalk between ubiquitination and endocrine therapy.Journal of molecular medicine (Berlin, Germany) · 2023
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Osteoporotic Conditions Influence the Activity of Adipose-Derived Stem Cells.Tissue engineering and regenerative medicine · 2020
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

P HadjiDepartment of Endocrinology, Reproductive Medicine, and Osteoporosis, Philipps-University of Marburg, Marburg, Germany.
Philipps University of Marburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs), which exhibit estrogen receptor agonist or antagonist activity based on the target tissue, have evolved through multiple generations for the prevention and/or treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis. An ideal SERM would protect bone without stimulating the breast or endometrium. Raloxifene, lasofoxifene, and bazedoxifene have demonstrated unique preclinical profiles. Raloxifene, lasofoxifene, and bazedoxifene have shown significant reduction in the risk of vertebral fracture and improvement in bone mineral density versus placebo in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. Raloxifene has been shown to reduce the risk of non-vertebral fractures in women with severe prevalent fractures at baseline. Lasofoxifene 0.5 mg, but not lasofoxifene 0.25 mg, has shown reduction in the incidence of non-vertebral fractures. Bazedoxifene 20 mg has been associated with a significant reduction in the risk of non-vertebral fracture versus placebo and raloxifene 60 mg in women at higher baseline fracture risk. Neither raloxifene, lasofoxifene, nor bazedoxifene has shown an increase in the incidence of endometrial hyperplasia or carcinoma. All SERMs have been associated with increased venous thromboembolic events and hot flushes. SERMs are effective alternatives for women who cannot tolerate or are unwilling to take bisphosphonates and may be appropriate for women at higher risk of fracture, particularly younger women who expect to remain on therapy for many years and are concerned about the long-term safety of bisphosphonates.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overBone DensityBone Density Conservation AgentsBreast NeoplasmsEndometrial NeoplasmsFemaleFractures, BoneHot FlashesHumansIndolesMiddle AgedOsteoporosis, PostmenopausalPyrrolidinesRaloxifene HydrochlorideSelective Estrogen Receptor ModulatorsbazedoxifeneBone Density Conservation AgentsIndolesLasofoxifenePyrrolidinesRaloxifene HydrochlorideSelective Estrogen Receptor ModulatorsTetrahydronaphthalenes

Identifiers

PMID22853318
PMCPMC3793274
OpenAlexW2088214381

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.