ArticleThe Journal of manual & manipulative therapy2011
Biomechanical measures of knee joint mobilization.
Article in The Journal of manual & manipulative therapy, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- The effect of real-time feedback on learning lumbar spine joint mobilization by entry-level doctor of physical therapy students: a randomized, controlled, crossover trial.The Journal of manual & manipulative therapy · 2020Trial
- Utilization of Blood Flow Restriction Therapy with a Former Triathlete After Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Case Report.International journal of sports physical therapy · 2024Article
- Reliability and accuracy of an expert physical therapist as a reference standard for a manual therapy joint mobilization trial.The Journal of manual & manipulative therapy · 2021Article
- Acute Effects of Increased Joint Mobilization Treatment Duration on Ankle Function and Dynamic Postural Control in Female Athletes With Chronic Ankle Instability.Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine · 2020Article
- THE EFFECTS OF POSTERIOR TIBIAL MOBILIZATION ON MENISCAL MOVEMENT: AN IN-SITU INVESTIGATION.International journal of sports physical therapy · 2019Article
- The intra-rater reliability of a revised 3-point grading system for accessory joint mobilizations.The Journal of manual & manipulative therapy · 2017Article
- In vivo measurements of humeral movement during posterior glenohumeral mobilizations.The Journal of manual & manipulative therapy · 2016Article
- Joint mobilization forces and therapist reliability in subjects with knee osteoarthritis.The Journal of manual & manipulative therapy · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
background and purposeThe purpose of this study was to quantify the biomechanical properties of specific manual therapy techniques in patients with symptomatic knee osteoarthritis.
methodsTwenty subjects (7 female/13 male, age 54±8 years, ht 1·7±0·1 m, wt 94·2±21·8 kg) participated in this study. One physical therapist delivered joint mobilizations (tibiofemoral extension and flexion; patellofemoral medial-lateral and inferior glide) at two grades (Maitland's grade III and grade IV). A capacitance-based pressure mat was used to capture biomechanical characteristics of force and frequency during 2 trials of 15 second mobilizations. Statistical analysis included intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC(3,1)) for intrarater reliability and 2×4 repeated measures analyses of variance and post-hoc comparison tests.
resultsForce (Newtons) measurements (mean, max.) for grade III were: extension 45, 74; flexion 39, 61; medial-lateral glide 20, 34; inferior glide 16, 27. Force (Newtons) measurements (mean, max.) for grade IV were: extension 57, 76; flexion 47, 68; medial-lateral glide 23, 36; inferior glide 18, 35. Frequency (Hz) measurements were between 0·9 and 1·2 for grade III, and between 2·1 and 2·4 for grade IV. ICCs were above 0·90 for almost all measures. DISCUSSION AND
conclusionMaximum force measures were between the ranges reported for cervical and lumbar mobilization at similar grades. Mean force measures were greater at grade IV than III. Oscillation frequency and peak-to-peak amplitude measures were consistent with the grade performed (i.e. greater frequency at grade IV, greater peak-to-peak amplitude at grade III). Intrarater reliability for force, peak-to-peak amplitude and oscillation frequency for knee joint mobilizations was excellent.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.