Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22851570›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology2012

Clinical human papillomavirus detection forecasts cervical cancer risk in women over 18 years of follow-up.

Philip E Castle, Andrew G Glass, Brenda B Rush, David R Scott, Nicolas Wentzensen, Julia C Gage, Julie Buckland, Greg Rydzak, Attila T Lorincz, Sholom Wacholder

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03345875 (Feasibility and Acceptability of HPV Self-Collection Cervical Cancer Screening and Treatment in Clinics and the Community in Botswana), which is not on this map. Cited by 40 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03345875 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2017, after this paper: background citation

Feasibility and Acceptability of HPV Self-Collection Cervical Cancer Screening and Treatment in Clinics and the Community in Botswana

TypeinterventionalSponsorJhpiegoRan2017 to 2018Enrolled1,022ConditionsHuman Papillomavirus Infection, Cervical CancerArmsHPV self collection, followed by visual assessment of the cervix for treatment (VAT) and treatment
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Validation of an on-chip p16Scientific reports · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Screening for Cervical Cancer.The Medical clinics of North America · 2020
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. A cocktail of p16Oncotarget · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Philip E CastleAmerican Society for Clinical Pathology, 1225 New York Ave NW, Suite 350, Washington, DC 20005, USA. philip.castle@ascp.org
Andrew G Glass
Brenda B Rush
David R Scott
Nicolas Wentzensen
Julia C Gage
Julie Buckland
Greg Rydzak
Attila T Lorincz
Sholom Wacholder

Funding

Human Papillomavirus (HPV) Natural History, Genomics and Risk AssessmentZIACP010206 · NCI · DIVISION OF CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY AND GENETICS · PI SCHIFFMAN, MARK · 2010 to 2025
$17.1M
Intramural NIH HHS
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo describe the long-term (≥ 10 years) benefits of clinical human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA testing for cervical precancer and cancer risk prediction.

methodsCervicovaginal lavages collected from 19,512 women attending a health maintenance program were retrospectively tested for HPV using a clinical test. HPV positives were tested for HPV16 and HPV18 individually using a research test. A Papanicolaou (Pap) result classified as atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASC-US) or more severe was considered abnormal. Women underwent follow-up prospectively with routine annual Pap testing up to 18 years. Cumulative incidence rates (CIRs) of ≥ grade 3 cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN3+) or cancer for enrollment test results were calculated.

resultsA baseline negative HPV test provided greater reassurance against CIN3+ over the 18-year follow-up than a normal Pap (CIR, 0.90% v 1.27%). Although both baseline Pap and HPV tests predicted who would develop CIN3+ within the first 2 years of follow-up, only HPV testing predicted who would develop CIN3+ 10 to 18 years later (P = .004). HPV16- and HPV18-positive women with normal Pap were at elevated risk of CIN3+ compared with other HPV-positive women with normal Pap and were at similar risk of CIN3+ compared with women with a low-grade squamous intraepithelial Pap.

conclusionHPV testing to rule out cervical disease followed by Pap testing and possibly combined with the detection of HPV16 and HPV18 among HPV positives to identify those at immediate risk of CIN3+ would be an efficient algorithm for cervical cancer screening, especially in women age 30 years or older.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAge FactorsAlgorithmsCarcinoma, Squamous CellDNA, ViralFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHealth Maintenance OrganizationsHuman papillomavirus 16Human papillomavirus 18HumansIncidenceKaplan-Meier EstimateMass ScreeningMiddle AgedDNA, Viral

Identifiers

PMID22851570
PMCPMC3732003

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.