ArticleExperimental brain research2012
Using prediction errors to drive saccade adaptation: the implicit double-step task.
Article in Experimental brain research, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- In pursuit of saccade awareness: Limited volitional control and minimal conscious access to catch-up saccades during smooth pursuit eye movements.Journal of vision · 2026Article
- Visuospatial, oculomotor, and executive reading skills evolve in elementary school, and errors are significant: a topological RAN study.Frontiers in psychology · 2024Article
- Article
- Age-related effects of increasing postural challenge on eye movement onset latencies to visual targets.Experimental brain research · 2016Article
- Visual Space Constructed by Saccade Motor Maps.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2016Review
- Oculomotor Adaptation Elicited By Intra-Saccadic Visual Stimulation: Time-Course of Efficient Visual Target Perturbation.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2016Article
- Saccade Adaptation and Visual Uncertainty.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2016Article
- Multiple timescales in the adaptation of the rotational VOR.Journal of neurophysiology · 2015Article
- Impairment of saccade adaptation in a patient with a focal thalamic lesion.Journal of neurophysiology · 2015Article
- Similarities in error processing establish a link between saccade prediction at baseline and adaptation performance.Journal of neurophysiology · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
A prediction-based error signal, neurally computed as the difference between predicted and observed movement outcomes, has been proposed as the driving force for motor learning. This suggests that the generation of predictive saccades to periodically paced targets-whose performance accuracy is actively maintained using this same error signal-invokes the motor-learning network. We examined whether a simple predictive-saccade task (implicit double-step adaptation, in which targets are gradually displaced outward to exaggerate normal hypometric movement errors) can stand in place of a traditional double-step saccade-adaptation task to induce an increase in saccade gain. We find that the implicit double-step adaptation task can induce significant gain-increase adaptation (of comparable magnitude to that of the standard double-step task) in normal control subjects. Unlike control subjects, patients with impaired cerebella are unable to adapt their saccades in response to this paradigm; this implies that the cerebellum is crucial for processing prediction-based error signals for motor learning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.