Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22850726›Full record

ReviewProceedings of the Japan Academy. Series B, Physical and biological sciences2012

Unnatural base pair systems toward the expansion of the genetic alphabet in the central dogma.

Ichiro Hirao, Michiko Kimoto

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Proceedings of the Japan Academy. Series B, Physical and biological sciences, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Investigation of the stability of D5SIC-DNAM-incorporated DNA duplex inPhysical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP · 2024
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Reprogramming the genetic code.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2021
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. The Structural Basis for Processing of Unnatural Base Pairs by DNA Polymerases.Chemistry (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2020
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Reply to Hettinger: Hydrophobic unnatural base pairs and the expansion of the genetic alphabet.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2017
    Article
  19. Helix instability and self-pairing prevent unnatural base pairs from expanding the genetic alphabet.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2017
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ichiro HiraoRIKEN Systems and Structural Biology Center (SSBC), Yokohama, Japan. ihirao@riken.jp
Michiko Kimoto

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Toward the expansion of the genetic alphabet of DNA, several artificial third base pairs (unnatural base pairs) have been created. Synthetic DNAs containing the unnatural base pairs can be amplified faithfully by PCR, along with the natural A-T and G-C pairs, and transcribed into RNA. The unnatural base pair systems now have high potential to open the door to next generation biotechnology. The creation of unnatural base pairs is a consequence of repeating "proof of concept" experiments. In the process, initially designed base pairs were modified to address their weak points. Some of them were artificially evolved to ones with higher efficiency and selectivity in polymerase reactions, while others were eliminated from the analysis. Here, we describe the process of unnatural base pair development, as well as the tests of their applications.

Indexed as

Base PairingBase SequenceGenetic CodeHydrogen BondingHydrophobic and Hydrophilic InteractionsMolecular Sequence Data

Identifiers

PMID22850726
PMCPMC3422687

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.