Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22850166›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2012

A qualitative study to identify reasons for discharges against medical advice in the cardiovascular setting.

Eberechukwu Onukwugha, Elijah Saunders, C Daniel Mullins, Françoise G Pradel, Marni Zuckerman, F Ellen Loh, Matthew R Weir

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Hearts and Minds: an Exercise in Clinical Reasoning.Journal of general internal medicine · 2021
    Article
  6. Article
  7. [Concerns about neonates discharged against medical advice from the neonatal intensive care unit].Zhongguo dang dai er ke za zhi = Chinese journal of contemporary pediatrics · 2017
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Eberechukwu OnukwughaDepartment of Pharmaceutical Health Services Research, School of Pharmacy, University of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Elijah Saunders
C Daniel Mullins
Françoise G Pradel
Marni Zuckerman
F Ellen Loh
Matthew R Weir

Funding

Clinical Research Career Development (RMI)K12RR023250 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE · PI SHULDINER, ALAN R. · 2005 to 2009
$13.3M
NCRR NIH HHS K12 RR023250
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCardiovascular disease (CVD) is responsible for the largest number of discharges against medical advice (AMA). However, there is limited information regarding the reasons for discharges AMA in the CVD setting.

objectiveTo identify reasons for discharges AMA among patients with CVD.

designQualitative study using focus group interviews (FGIs).

participantsA convenience sample of patients with a CVD-related discharge diagnosis who left AMA and providers (physicians, nurses and social workers) whose patients have left AMA. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOMES: To identify patients' reasons for discharges AMA as identified by patients and providers. To identify strategies to reduce discharges AMA. APPROACH: FGIs were grouped according to patients, physicians and nurses/social workers. A content analysis was performed independently by three coauthors to identify the nature and range of the participants' viewpoints on the reasons for discharges AMA. The content analysis involved specific categories of reasons as motivated by the Health Belief Model as well as reasons (ie, themes) that emerged from the interview data.

results9 patients, 10 physicians and 23 nurses/social workers were recruited for the FGIs. Patients and providers reported the same three reasons for discharges AMA: (1) patient's preference for their own doctor, (2) long wait time and (3) factors outside the hospital. Patients identified an unmet expectation to be involved in setting the treatment plan as a reason to leave AMA. Participants identified improved communication as a solution for reducing discharges AMA.

conclusionsPatients wanted more involvement in their care, exhibited a strong preference for their own primary physician, felt that they spent a long time waiting in the hospital and were motivated to leave AMA by factors outside the hospital. Providers identified similar reasons except the patients' desire for involvement. Additional research is needed to determine the applicability of results in broader patient and provider populations.

Identifiers

PMID22850166
PMCPMC4400638

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.