ArticlePloS one2012
Analyzing multi-locus plant barcoding datasets with a composition vector method based on adjustable weighted distance.
Article in PloS one, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe composition vector (CV) method has been proved to be a reliable and fast alignment-free method to analyze large COI barcoding data. In this study, we modify this method for analyzing multi-gene datasets for plant DNA barcoding. The modified method includes an adjustable-weighted algorithm for the vector distance according to the ratio in sequence length of the candidate genes for each pair of taxa. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL
findingsThree datasets, matK+rbcL dataset with 2,083 sequences, matK+rbcL dataset with 397 sequences and matK+rbcL+trnH-psbA dataset with 397 sequences, were tested. We showed that the success rates of grouping sequences at the genus/species level based on this modified CV approach are always higher than those based on the traditional K2P/NJ method. For the matK+rbcL datasets, the modified CV approach outperformed the K2P-NJ approach by 7.9% in both the 2,083-sequence and 397-sequence datasets, and for the matK+rbcL+trnH-psbA dataset, the CV approach outperformed the traditional approach by 16.7%.
conclusionsWe conclude that the modified CV approach is an efficient method for analyzing large multi-gene datasets for plant DNA barcoding. Source code, implemented in C++ and supported on MS Windows, is freely available for download at http://math.xtu.edu.cn/myphp/math/research/source/Barcode_source_codes.zip.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.