Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22848513›Full record

Trial reportPloS one2012

Polymorphisms in the ERCC5 gene and risk of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) in Eastern Chinese populations.

Mei-Ling Zhu, Ting-Yan Shi, Hai-Chuan Hu, Jing He, Mengyun Wang, Li Jin, Ya-Jun Yang, Jiu-Cun Wang, Meng-Hong Sun, Huan Chen and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical TrialComparative Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in PloS one, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Associations between polymorphisms of the XPC gene and lung cancer susceptibility: a meta-analysis.Tumour biology : the journal of the International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine · 2014
    Pooled it
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Journal of Cancer · 2016
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. XPG Asp1104His polymorphism and gastrointestinal cancers risk: a meta-analysis.International journal of clinical and experimental medicine · 2014
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Mei-Ling ZhuDepartment of Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.
Ting-Yan Shi
Hai-Chuan Hu
Jing He
Mengyun Wang
Li Jin
Ya-Jun Yang
Jiu-Cun Wang
Meng-Hong Sun
Huan Chen
Kuai-Le Zhao
Zhen Zhang
Hai-Quan Chen
Jia-Qing Xiang
Qing-Yi Wei
Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center · CNShanghai Medical College of Fudan University · CNState Key Laboratory of Genetic EngineeringThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundExcision repair cross complementing group 5 (ERCC5 or XPG) plays an important role in regulating DNA excision repair; its functional single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) may alter DNA repair capacity and thus contribute to cancer risk. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL

findingsIn a hospital-based case-control study of 1115 esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) cases and 1117 cancer-free controls, we genotyped three potentially functional SNPs of ERCC5 (SNPs, rs2296147T>C, rs2094258C>T and rs873601G>A) and estimated crude and adjusted odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for their associations with risk of ESCC using unconditional logistic regression models. We also calculated false-positive report probabilities (FPRPs) for significant findings. We found that compared with the TT genotype, ERCC5 rs2296147 C variant genotypes were associated with a significantly lower ESCC risk (CT: adjusted OR = 0.76, 95% CI = 0.63-0.93, CT/CC: adjusted OR = 0.80, 95% CI = 0.67-0.96); however, this risk was not observed for the other two SNPs (rs2094258C>T and rs873601 G>A), nor in further stratification and haplotype analysis. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCES: These findings suggested that ERCC5 polymorphisms may contribute to risk of ESCC in Eastern Chinese populations, but the effect was weak and needs further validation by larger population-based case-control studies.

Indexed as

HaplotypesPolymorphism, Single NucleotideAgedAsian PeopleCarcinoma, Squamous CellCase-Control StudiesChinaDNA-Binding ProteinsDNA Excision Repair Protein ERCC-5EndonucleasesEsophageal NeoplasmsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm ProteinsDNA-Binding ProteinsDNA Excision Repair Protein ERCC-5EndonucleasesNeoplasm ProteinsNuclear ProteinsTranscription Factors

Identifiers

PMID22848513
PMCPMC3406052
OpenAlexW2027070146

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.