ArticleThe Australasian medical journal2012
Internet usage and openness to internet-delivered health information among Australian adults aged over 50 years.
Article in The Australasian medical journal, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.
- A randomised controlled trial of personalised decision support delivered via the internet for bowel cancer screening with a faecal occult blood test: the effects of tailoring of messages according to social cognitive variables on participation.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2015Trial
- Assessing the Capability of Large Language Models for Navigation of the Australian Health Care System: Comparative Study.JMIR AI · 2025Article
- Gender Differences in the Digital Divide, Digital Back-Feeding, and Health-Related Quality of Life Among Rural Older Adults: Cross-Sectional Study.JMIR aging · 2025Article
- Technology use and health behavior among patients with diabetes: do underlying motives for technology adoption matter?Frontiers in digital health · 2025Article
- Mediating Effects of Information Access on Internet Use and Multidimensional Health Among Middle-Aged and Older Adults: Nationwide Cross-Sectional Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2024Article
- Online Health Information Seeking and Preventative Health Actions: Cross-Generational Online Survey Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2024Article
- Association Between Internet Use and Physical Health, Mental Health, and Subjective Health in Middle-aged and Older Adults: Nationally Representative Cross-sectional Survey in China.Journal of medical Internet research · 2023Article
- Current Situations and Challenges in the Development of Health Information Literacy.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023Review
- Online Health Information Seeking Behaviors Among Older Adults: Systematic Scoping Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2022Article
- The potential impact of 5G telecommunication technology on ophthalmology.Eye (London, England) · 2021Review
- The Effect of Socio-Economic Status on Health Information Literacy among Urban Older Adults: Evidence from Western China.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Article
- Web-Based Communication Strategies Designed to Improve Intention to Minimize Risk for Colorectal Cancer: Randomized Controlled Trial.JMIR cancer · 2018Article
- Factors influencing the level of patients using the internet to gather information before anaesthesia: a single-centre survey of 815 patients in Switzerland : The internet for patient information before anaesthesia.BMC anesthesiology · 2017Article
- eHealth literacy and Web 2.0 health information seeking behaviors among baby boomers and older adults.Journal of medical Internet research · 2015Article
- Acceptance of Internet-based health care services among households in Poland: secondary analysis of a population-based survey.Journal of medical Internet research · 2012Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe cost of healthcare in Australia's ageing population is ever increasing. In an attempt to reduce these rising costs, the internet has been suggested as a possible means of disseminating health-related information and promoting preventive health behaviours.
objectiveOur objective was to determine the proportion of Australians aged 50-74 years who have internet access, and the characteristics of internet usage, current online health information seeking behaviour, and the willingness to receive unsolicited health information via the Internet.
methodA random sample of N=25,511 urban older Australians aged 50 to 74 years received a questionnaire via mail and were asked to complete questions concerning variables related to internet usage. N=8,762 returned a competed questionnaire.
resultsEighty-two per cent of respondents reported having internet access, mainly at home (94%), and the majority actively use this technology (93%). Younger people and those of higher socio-economic status and higher education were more likely to have access (p<.001). Approximately 61% reported actively seeking health-related information online but only 32% expressed a willingness to receive unsolicited health information via the internet. Females were more likely to currently search for health-related information than males but were less likely to be open to receiving unsolicited health information (both p<.001).
conclusionAccording to the data it appears the majority of urban Australians aged over 50 have access to the internet at some location and 60% of them use the internet for health-related purposes. The data also suggests, however, that delivering health information via the internet alone would disadvantage those who are older, less educated, and less financially well-off.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.