ArticleInternational journal of nanomedicine2012
Evaluation of the genotoxicity of cellulose nanofibers.
Article in International journal of nanomedicine, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Application of Inorganic Nanomaterials in Cultural Heritage Conservation, Risk of Toxicity, and Preventive Measures.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Analysis of the In Vitro Toxicity of Nanocelluloses in Human Lung Cells as Compared to Multi-Walled Carbon Nanotubes.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Genotoxicity of Three Micro/Nanocelluloses with Different Physicochemical Characteristics in MG-63 and V79 Cells.Journal of xenobiotics · 2022Article
- Genotoxicity assessment of cellulose nanofibrils using a standard battery ofToxicology reports · 2022Article
- Role of Surface Chemistry in the In Vitro Lung Response to Nanofibrillated Cellulose.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Perspective Applications and Associated Challenges of Using Nanocellulose in Treating Bone-Related Diseases.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2021Review
- Enhanced morphological transformation of human lung epithelial cells by continuous exposure to cellulose nanocrystals.Chemosphere · 2020Article
- The Crystallinity and Aspect Ratio of Cellulose Nanomaterials Determine Their Pro-Inflammatory and Immune Adjuvant Effects In Vitro and In Vivo.Small (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2019Article
- Nanoparticle-mediated targeted drug delivery for breast cancer treatment.Biochimica et biophysica acta. Reviews on cancer · 2019Review
- Cytotoxic and genotoxic effects of silver nanoparticle/carboxymethyl cellulose on Allium cepa.Environmental monitoring and assessment · 2017Article
- Fibrillar vs crystalline nanocellulose pulmonary epithelial cell responses: Cytotoxicity or inflammation?Chemosphere · 2017Article
- A critical review of the current knowledge regarding the biological impact of nanocellulose.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2016Review
- Ecotoxicological effects of carbon nanotubes and cellulose nanofibers in Chlorella vulgaris.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2014Article
- Multimodality labeling strategies for the investigation of nanocrystalline cellulose biodistribution in a mouse model of breast cancer.Nuclear medicine and biologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAgricultural products and by products provide the primary materials for a variety of technological applications in diverse industrial sectors. Agro-industrial wastes, such as cotton and curaua fibers, are used to prepare nanofibers for use in thermoplastic films, where they are combined with polymeric matrices, and in biomedical applications such as tissue engineering, amongst other applications. The development of products containing nanofibers offers a promising alternative for the use of agricultural products, adding value to the chains of production. However, the emergence of new nanotechnological products demands that their risks to human health and the environment be evaluated. This has resulted in the creation of the new area of nanotoxicology, which addresses the toxicological aspects of these materials. PURPOSE AND
methodsContributing to these developments, the present work involved a genotoxicological study of different nanofibers, employing chromosomal aberration and comet assays, as well as cytogenetic and molecular analyses, to obtain preliminary information concerning nanofiber safety. The methodology consisted of exposure of Allium cepa roots, and animal cell cultures (lymphocytes and fibroblasts), to different types of nanofibers. Negative controls, without nanofibers present in the medium, were used for comparison.
resultsThe nanofibers induced different responses according to the cell type used. In plant cells, the most genotoxic nanofibers were those derived from green, white, and brown cotton, and curaua, while genotoxicity in animal cells was observed using nanofibers from brown cotton and curaua. An important finding was that ruby cotton nanofibers did not cause any significant DNA breaks in the cell types employed.
conclusionThis work demonstrates the feasibility of determining the genotoxic potential of nanofibers derived from plant cellulose to obtain information vital both for the future usage of these materials in agribusiness and for an understanding of their environmental impacts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.