Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22848088›Full record

ArticleSystematic biology2012

An extreme case of plant-insect codiversification: figs and fig-pollinating wasps.

Astrid Cruaud, Nina Rønsted, Bhanumas Chantarasuwan, Lien Siang Chou, Wendy L Clement, Arnaud Couloux, Benjamin Cousins, Gwenaëlle Genson, Rhett D Harrison, Paul E Hanson and 19 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Systematic biology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 111 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
111citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

111 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. The incidence and pattern of copollinator diversification in dioecious and monoecious figs.Evolution; international journal of organic evolution · 2015
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

51 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

29 authors.

Astrid CruaudINRA, UMR1062 CBGP, F-34988 Montferrier-sur-Lez, France; Jodrell Laboratory, Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, TW9 3DS, UK.
Nina Rønsted
Bhanumas Chantarasuwan
Lien Siang Chou
Wendy L Clement
Arnaud Couloux
Benjamin Cousins
Gwenaëlle Genson
Rhett D Harrison
Paul E Hanson
Martine Hossaert-McKey
Roula Jabbour-Zahab
Emmanuelle Jousselin
Carole Kerdelhué
Finn Kjellberg
Carlos Lopez-Vaamonde
John Peebles
Yan-Qiong Peng
Rodrigo Augusto Santinelo Pereira
Tselil Schramm
Rosichon Ubaidillah
Simon van Noort
George D Weiblen
Da-Rong Yang
Anak Yodpinyanee
Ran Libeskind-Hadas
James M Cook
Jean-Yves Rasplus
Vincent Savolainen

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It is thought that speciation in phytophagous insects is often due to colonization of novel host plants, because radiations of plant and insect lineages are typically asynchronous. Recent phylogenetic comparisons have supported this model of diversification for both insect herbivores and specialized pollinators. An exceptional case where contemporaneous plant-insect diversification might be expected is the obligate mutualism between fig trees (Ficus species, Moraceae) and their pollinating wasps (Agaonidae, Hymenoptera). The ubiquity and ecological significance of this mutualism in tropical and subtropical ecosystems has long intrigued biologists, but the systematic challenge posed by >750 interacting species pairs has hindered progress toward understanding its evolutionary history. In particular, taxon sampling and analytical tools have been insufficient for large-scale cophylogenetic analyses. Here, we sampled nearly 200 interacting pairs of fig and wasp species from across the globe. Two supermatrices were assembled: on an average, wasps had sequences from 77% of 6 genes (5.6 kb), figs had sequences from 60% of 5 genes (5.5 kb), and overall 850 new DNA sequences were generated for this study. We also developed a new analytical tool, Jane 2, for event-based phylogenetic reconciliation analysis of very large data sets. Separate Bayesian phylogenetic analyses for figs and fig wasps under relaxed molecular clock assumptions indicate Cretaceous diversification of crown groups and contemporaneous divergence for nearly half of all fig and pollinator lineages. Event-based cophylogenetic analyses further support the codiversification hypothesis. Biogeographic analyses indicate that the present-day distribution of fig and pollinator lineages is consistent with a Eurasian origin and subsequent dispersal, rather than with Gondwanan vicariance. Overall, our findings indicate that the fig-pollinator mutualism represents an extreme case among plant-insect interactions of coordinated dispersal and long-term codiversification. [Biogeography; coevolution; cospeciation; host switching; long-branch attraction; phylogeny.].

Indexed as

PhylogenyAnimalsBayes TheoremFicusGenetic SpeciationPhylogeographyPollinationSymbiosisWasps

Identifiers

PMID22848088
PMCPMC3478567

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.