Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22847979›Full record

ArticleJournal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials2012

Bone healing response to a synthetic calcium sulfate/β-tricalcium phosphate graft material in a sheep vertebral body defect model.

H L Yang, X S Zhu, L Chen, C M Chen, D C Mangham, L A Coulton, S S Aiken

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05706909 (The Use of Genex in the Management of Early-Stage Osteonecrosis of the Femoral Head), which is not on this map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05706909 active not recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

The Use of Genex in the Management of Early-Stage Osteonecrosis of the Femoral Head

TypeobservationalSponsorThe Cleveland ClinicRan2023 to 2027Enrolled22ConditionsAvascular Necrosis, OsteonecrosisArmsGenex with ABMC
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. An overview of de novo bone generation in animal models.Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society · 2021
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Is calcium phosphate augmentation a viable option for osteoporotic hip fractures?Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2018
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. PTH Induces Systemically Administered Mesenchymal Stem Cells to Migrate to and Regenerate Spine Injuries.Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2016
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

H L YangDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China.
X S Zhu
L Chen
C M Chen
D C Mangham
L A Coulton
S S Aiken
First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University · CNSoochow University · CNNetComposites (United Kingdom) · GBUniversity of Sheffield · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The introduction of a material able to promote osteogenesis and remodelling activity in a clinically relevant time frame in vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty procedures may have patient benefit. We report the in-vivo performance of a biphasic synthetic bone graft material (Genex Paste, Biocomposites, UK) [test material], composed of calcium sulfate and β-tricalcium phosphate, implanted into a sheep vertebral defect model. Cavities drilled into 4 adjacent vertebrae (L2 to L5) of 24 skeletally mature sheep were; (1) filled with the test material; (2) filled with commercially available polymethylmethacrylate [PMMA] cement; (3) remained empty [sham]. Analysis was performed immediately after implantation and at 8, 16, and 36 weeks post implantation. Sites were evaluated for bone growth with microCT analysis, histological examination, and mechanical testing under compression. The test material exhibited an improved tissue response over the PMMA, indicating a superior biological tolerance. MicroCT and histology indicated marked osteoregenerative capacity of the test material when compared with sham and the PMMA. The percentage of new bone formation was higher for the test material than sham at 16 and 36 weeks post implantation, with bone regeneration almost complete at 36 weeks in this group. Resorption of test material and the integration into new bone tissue were demonstrated.

Indexed as

Absorbable ImplantsMaterials TestingSpineAnimalsBone CementsBone RegenerationBone SubstitutesCalcium PhosphatesCalcium SulfateDisease Models, AnimalOsteogenesisPolymethyl MethacrylateSheepSpinal InjuriesTime FactorsX-Ray Microtomographybeta-tricalcium phosphateBone CementsBone SubstitutesCalcium PhosphatesCalcium SulfatePolymethyl Methacrylate

Identifiers

PMID22847979
PMCPMC3531612
OpenAlexW1987706543

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.