Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22847785›Full record

ArticleInvestigational new drugs2013

A phase I study of prolonged infusion of triapine in combination with fixed dose rate gemcitabine in patients with advanced solid tumors.

Amir Mortazavi, Yonghua Ling, Ludmila Katherine Martin, Lai Wei, Mitch A Phelps, Zhongfa Liu, Erica J Harper, S Percy Ivy, Xin Wu, Bing-Sen Zhou and 8 more

Open access · greenAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase I
In one paragraph

Article in Investigational new drugs, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Amir MortazaviDivision of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University and The Comprehensive Cancer Center, A454 Starling-Loving Hall, 320 West 10th Ave, Columbus, OH, 43210, USA.
Yonghua Ling
Ludmila Katherine Martin
Lai Wei
Mitch A Phelps
Zhongfa Liu
Erica J Harper
S Percy Ivy
Xin Wu
Bing-Sen Zhou
Xiyong Liu
Deidre Deam
J Paul Monk
William J Hicks
Yun Yen
Gregory A Otterson
Michael R Grever
Tanios Bekaii-Saab
The Ohio State University · USCity of Hope · USNational Cancer Institute · US

Funding

PHASE I TRIALS OF ANTICANCER AGENTSU01CA076576 · NCI · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI GREVER, MICHAEL R · 1998 to 2013
$9.1M
NCI NIH HHS U01 CA076576
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeProlonged exposure of cancer cells to triapine, an inhibitor of ribonucleotide reductase, followed by gemcitabine enhances gemcitabine activity in vitro. Fixed-dose-rate gemcitabine (FDR-G) has improved efficacy compared to standard-dose. We conducted a phase I trial to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), safety, pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics (PD), and preliminary efficacy of prolonged triapine infusion followed by FDR-G. EXPERIMENTAL

designTriapine was given as a 24-hour infusion, immediately followed by FDR-G (1000 mg/m(2) over 100-minute). Initially, this combination was administered days 1 and 8 of a 21-day cycle (Arm A, triapine starting dose 120 mg); but because of myelosuppression, it was changed to days 1 and 15 of a 28-day cycle (Arm B, starting dose of triapine 75 mg). Triapine steady-state concentrations (Css) and circulating ribonucleotide reductase M2-subunit (RRM2) were measured.

resultsThirty-six patients were enrolled. The MTD was determined to be triapine 90 mg (24-hour infusion) immediately followed by gemcitabine 1000 mg/m(2) (100-minute infusion), every 2 weeks of a 4-week cycle. DLTs included grade 4 thrombocytopenia, leukopenia and neutropenia. The treatment was well tolerated with fatigue, nausea/vomiting, fever, transaminitis, and cytopenias being the most common toxicities. Among 30 evaluable patients, 1 had a partial response and 15 had stable disease. Triapine PK was similar, although more variable, compared to previous studies using doses normalized to body-surface-area. Steady decline in circulating levels of RRM2 may correlate with outcome.

conclusionsThis combination was well tolerated and showed evidence of preliminary activity in this heavily pretreated patient population, including prior gemcitabine failure.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overAnemiaAntineoplastic AgentsAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsDeoxycytidineFemaleGemcitabineHumansLeukopeniaMaleMaximum Tolerated DoseMiddle AgedNeoplasmsPyridines3-aminopyridine-2-carboxaldehyde thiosemicarbazoneAntineoplastic AgentsDeoxycytidineGemcitabinePyridinesRibonucleoside Diphosphate Reductaseribonucleotide reductase M2Thiosemicarbazones

Identifiers

PMID22847785
PMCPMC3646991
OpenAlexW2064728753

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.