Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22847540›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of botany2012

Ontologies as integrative tools for plant science.

Ramona L Walls, Balaji Athreya, Laurel Cooper, Justin Elser, Maria A Gandolfo, Pankaj Jaiswal, Christopher J Mungall, Justin Preece, Stefan Rensing, Barry Smith and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of botany, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Advancing utilization of diverse global carrot (Frontiers in plant science · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. QTLTableMinerBMC bioinformatics · 2018
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Ramona L WallsNew York Botanical Garden, Bronx, 10458-5126, USA.
Balaji Athreya
Laurel Cooper
Justin Elser
Maria A Gandolfo
Pankaj Jaiswal
Christopher J Mungall
Justin Preece
Stefan Rensing
Barry Smith
Dennis W Stevenson

Funding

STANFORD COMPOSITE(RMI)U54HG004028 · NHGRI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI MUSEN, MARK A · 2005 to 2014
$36.2M
NHGRI NIH HHS U54 HG004028
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

premise of the studyBio-ontologies are essential tools for accessing and analyzing the rapidly growing pool of plant genomic and phenomic data. Ontologies provide structured vocabularies to support consistent aggregation of data and a semantic framework for automated analyses and reasoning. They are a key component of the semantic web.

methodsThis paper provides background on what bio-ontologies are, why they are relevant to botany, and the principles of ontology development. It includes an overview of ontologies and related resources that are relevant to plant science, with a detailed description of the Plant Ontology (PO). We discuss the challenges of building an ontology that covers all green plants (Viridiplantae). KEY

resultsOntologies can advance plant science in four keys areas: (1) comparative genetics, genomics, phenomics, and development; (2) taxonomy and systematics; (3) semantic applications; and (4) education.

conclusionsBio-ontologies offer a flexible framework for comparative plant biology, based on common botanical understanding. As genomic and phenomic data become available for more species, we anticipate that the annotation of data with ontology terms will become less centralized, while at the same time, the need for cross-species queries will become more common, causing more researchers in plant science to turn to ontologies.

Indexed as

BotanyComputational BiologyDatabase Management SystemsDatabases, FactualData Interpretation, StatisticalGenome, PlantGenomicsMolecular Sequence AnnotationPhenotypePlantsSemanticsTerminology as TopicVocabulary, Controlled

Identifiers

PMID22847540
PMCPMC3492881

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.