Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22847437›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2012

Molecular basis for the specification of floral organs by APETALA3 and PISTILLATA.

Samuel E Wuest, Diarmuid S O'Maoileidigh, Liina Rae, Kamila Kwasniewska, Andrea Raganelli, Katarzyna Hanczaryk, Amanda J Lohan, Brendan Loftus, Emmanuelle Graciet, Frank Wellmer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 120 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
120citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

120 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Genome-Wide Investigation ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Frontiers in plant science · 2025
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. 'Organ'ising Floral Organ Development.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review

60 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Samuel E WuestSmurfit Institute of Genetics, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin 2, Ireland.
Diarmuid S O'Maoileidigh
Liina Rae
Kamila Kwasniewska
Andrea Raganelli
Katarzyna Hanczaryk
Amanda J Lohan
Brendan Loftus
Emmanuelle Graciet
Frank Wellmer

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

How different organs are formed from small sets of undifferentiated precursor cells is a key question in developmental biology. To understand the molecular mechanisms underlying organ specification in plants, we studied the function of the homeotic selector genes APETALA3 (AP3) and PISTILLATA (PI), which control the formation of petals and stamens during Arabidopsis flower development. To this end, we characterized the activities of the transcription factors that AP3 and PI encode throughout flower development by using perturbation assays as well as transcript profiling and genomewide localization studies, in combination with a floral induction system that allows a stage-specific analysis of flower development by genomic technologies. We discovered considerable spatial and temporal differences in the requirement for AP3/PI activity during flower formation and show that they control different sets of genes at distinct phases of flower development. The genomewide identification of target genes revealed that AP3/PI act as bifunctional transcription factors: they activate genes involved in the control of numerous developmental processes required for organogenesis and repress key regulators of carpel formation. Our results imply considerable changes in the composition and topology of the gene network controlled by AP3/PI during the course of flower development. We discuss our results in light of a model for the mechanism underlying sex-determination in seed plants, in which AP3/PI orthologues might act as a switch between the activation of male and the repression of female development.

Indexed as

ArabidopsisArabidopsis ProteinsBinding SitesBody PatterningChromatin ImmunoprecipitationFlowersGene Expression Regulation, DevelopmentalGene Expression Regulation, PlantGene Knockdown TechniquesGenes, PlantMADS Domain ProteinsOligonucleotide Array Sequence AnalysisOrgan SpecificityPromoter Regions, GeneticProtein BindingTime FactorsAPETALA 3 protein, ArabidopsisArabidopsis ProteinsMADS Domain ProteinsPISTILLATA protein, Arabidopsis

Identifiers

PMID22847437
PMCPMC3421202

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.