Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22846723›Full record

ArticleThe American journal of pathology2012

Virulence factors identified by Cryptococcus neoformans mutant screen differentially modulate lung immune responses and brain dissemination.

Xiumiao He, Daniel M Lyons, Dena L Toffaletti, Fuyuan Wang, Yafeng Qiu, Michael J Davis, Daniel L Meister, Jeremy K Dayrit, Anthony Lee, John J Osterholzer and 2 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The American journal of pathology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Cryptococcal nutrient acquisition and pathogenesis: dining on the host.Microbiology and molecular biology reviews : MMBR · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Frontiers in immunology · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Clinical Aspects of Immune Damage in Cryptococcosis.Current fungal infection reports · 2019
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. New technology and resources for cryptococcal research.Fungal genetics and biology : FG & B · 2015
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. The intracellular life of Cryptococcus neoformans.Annual review of pathology · 2014
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Xiumiao HeVA Ann Arbor Health System, Research Service, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48105, USA.
Daniel M Lyons
Dena L Toffaletti
Fuyuan Wang
Yafeng Qiu
Michael J Davis
Daniel L Meister
Jeremy K Dayrit
Anthony Lee
John J Osterholzer
John R Perfect
Michal A Olszewski
VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System · USDuke University · USPulmonary and Critical Care Associates · USUniversity of Michigan–Ann Arbor · US

Funding

PULMONARY CELLULAR AND MOLECULAR BIOLOGY TRAININGT32HL007749 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI Robert Pickett Dickson · 1993 to 2026
$19.9M
Pathobiology of C. neoformans in the Central Nervous SystemR01AI073896 · NIAID · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI PERFECT, JOHN R. · 2008 to 2018
$4.4M
GENTIC &MOLECULAR BIOLOGY OF VIRULENCE IN C. NEOFORMANSR01AI028388 · NIAID · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI PERFECT, JOHN R. · 1991 to 2004
$1.9M
Modulation of Pulmonary Defenses in Pathobiology of Chronic InfectionsI01BX000656 · VA · VETERANS HEALTH ADMINISTRATION · PI OLSZEWSKI, MICHAL A · 2011 to 2025
–
BLRD VA I01 BX000656NHLBI NIH HHS T32 HL007749NHLBI NIH HHS T32-HL07749-19NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI028388NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI073896NIAID NIH HHS R01-AI28388NIAID NIH HHS R01-AI73896
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Deletions of cryptococcal PIK1, RUB1, and ENA1 genes independently rendered defects in yeast survival in human CSF and within macrophages. We evaluated virulence potential of these genes by comparing wild-type Cryptococcus neoformans strain H99 with deletant and complement strains in a BALB/c mouse model of pulmonary infection. Survival of infected mice; pulmonary cryptococcal growth and pathology; immunological parameters; dissemination kinetics; and CNS pathology were examined. Deletion of each PIK1, RUB1, and ENA1 differentially reduced pulmonary growth and dissemination rates of C. neoformans and extended mice survival. Furthermore, pik1Δ induced similar pathologies to H99, however, with significantly delayed onset; rub1Δ was more efficiently contained within pulmonary macrophages and was further delayed in causing CNS dissemination/pathology; whereas ena1Δ was progressively eliminated from the lungs and did not induce pathological lesions or disseminate into the CNS. The diminished virulence of mutant strains was associated with differential modulation of pulmonary immune responses, including changes in leukocyte subsets, cytokine responses, and macrophage activation status. Compared to H99 infection, mutants induced more hallmarks of a protective Th1 immune response, rather than Th2, and more classical, rather than alternative, macrophage activation. The magnitude of immunological effects precisely corresponded to the level of virulence displayed by each strain. Thus, cryptococcal PIK1, RUB1, and ENA1 differentially contribute to cryptococcal virulence, in correlation with their differential capacity to modulate immune responses.

Indexed as

Genetic TestingAnimalsBrainCryptococcus neoformansCytokinesDisease Models, AnimalFemaleFungal ProteinsGene DeletionGenes, FungalHumansLeukocyte Common AntigensLeukocytesLungLung Diseases, FungalMacrophage ActivationCytokinesFungal ProteinsLeukocyte Common AntigensVirulence Factors

Identifiers

PMID22846723
PMCPMC3463625
OpenAlexW2142119594

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.