Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22846151›Full record

ArticleGenes, brain, and behavior2012

High-throughput phenotyping of avoidance learning in mice discriminates different genotypes and identifies a novel gene.

G Maroteaux, M Loos, S van der Sluis, B Koopmans, E Aarts, K van Gassen, A Geurts, NeuroBSIK Mouse Phenomics Consortium, D A Largaespada, B M Spruijt and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genes, brain, and behavior, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Selective Ablation ofThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Deep learning-based behavioral analysis reaches human accuracy and is capable of outperforming commercial solutions.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2020
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

G MaroteauxDepartment of Functional Genomics, Center for Neurogenomics and Cognitive Research, Neuroscience Campus Amsterdam, VU University Amsterdam and VU Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
M Loos
S van der Sluis
B Koopmans
E Aarts
K van Gassen
A Geurts
NeuroBSIK Mouse Phenomics Consortium
D A Largaespada
B M Spruijt
O Stiedl
A B Smit
M Verhage

Funding

Sleeping Beauty for uncovering cancer genes in miceR01CA113636 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI LARGAESPADA, DAVID ANDREW · 2006 to 2016
$2.5M
Transposon Mutagenesis Development and Drug AbuseR01DA014764 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA TWIN CITIES · PI LARGAESPADA, DAVID ANDREW · 2003 to 2005
$959k
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA113636NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA014764
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recognizing and avoiding aversive situations are central aspects of mammalian cognition. These abilities are essential for health and survival and are expected to have a prominent genetic basis. We modeled these abilities in eight common mouse inbred strains covering ∼75% of the species' natural variation and in gene-trap mice (>2000 mice), using an unsupervised, automated assay with an instrumented home cage (PhenoTyper) containing a shelter with two entrances. Mice visited this shelter for 20-1200 times/24 h and 71% of all mice developed a significant and often strong preference for one entrance. Subsequently, a mild aversive stimulus (shelter illumination) was automatically delivered when mice used their preferred entrance. Different genotypes developed different coping strategies. Firstly, the number of entries via the preferred entrance decreased in DBA/2J, C57BL/6J and 129S1/SvImJ, indicating that these genotypes associated one specific entrance with the aversive stimulus. Secondly, mice started sleeping outside (C57BL/6J, DBA/2J), indicating they associated the shelter, in general, with the aversive stimulus. Some mice showed no evidence for an association between the entrance and the aversive light, but did show markedly shorter shelter residence times in response to illumination, indicating they did perceive illumination as aversive. Finally, using this assay, we screened 43 different mutants, which yielded a novel gene, specc1/cytospinB. This mutant showed profound and specific delay in avoidance learning. Together, these data suggest that different genotypes express distinct learning and/or memory of associations between shelter entrance and aversive stimuli, and that specc1/cytospinB is involved in this aspect of cognition.

Indexed as

Avoidance LearningGenotypePhenotypeAnimalsCell Cycle ProteinsCytoskeletal ProteinsHigh-Throughput Screening AssaysMaleMiceMice, Inbred StrainsMice, Mutant StrainsNuclear ProteinsPhosphoproteinsCell Cycle ProteinsCytoskeletal ProteinsNuclear ProteinsPhosphoproteinsSpecc1 protein, mouse

Identifiers

PMID22846151
PMCPMC3508728

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.