ReviewDrugs2012
Dextranomer in stabilized sodium hyaluronate (Solesta®): in adults with faecal incontinence.
Review in Drugs, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Review
- An enhanced Lactobacillus reuteri biofilm formulation that increases protection against experimental necrotizing enterocolitis.American journal of physiology. Gastrointestinal and liver physiology · 2018Article
- Enhanced Probiotic Potential ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Dextranomer in stabilized sodium hyaluronate, hereafter referred to as dextranomer/hyaluronic acid, is a biocompatible bulking agent administered by submucosal injection. It is hypothesized to expand the submucosal layer of the proximal anal canal, thereby augmenting bowel control. Treatment with dextranomer/hyaluronic acid was associated with symptomatic improvements in adult patients with faecal incontinence participating in a randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled, multinational study and a noncomparative, multinational study. In the double-blind study, patients in the dextranomer/hyaluronic acid group met the primary efficacy objective in that a significantly higher proportion of patients responded to treatment (≥50% reduction from baseline in the number of incontinence episodes) at the 6-month post-treatment timepoint than in the sham group (two of three primary response criteria), with the durability of the treatment response (≥25% reduction from baseline in the number of incontinence episodes) confirmed at the 12-month post-treatment timepoint (third primary response criterion). For the most part, dextranomer/hyaluronic acid did not significantly differ from the sham treatment in terms of quality of life and various other symptomatic endpoints at 6 months post-treatment in the double-blind study, although there were significant improvements from baseline in various parameters, such as the mean number of incontinence-free days, the median number of incontinence episodes and mean Faecal Incontinence Quality of Life domain scores, at 12 months post-treatment. In general, dextranomer/hyaluronic acid was well tolerated for up to 18 months post-treatment, with the majority of treatment-related adverse events considered mild or moderate in intensity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.