Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22845396›Full record

ReviewBritish journal of pharmacology2013

The case for induced pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes in pharmacological screening.

Jaffar M Khan, Alexander R Lyon, Sian E Harding

Abstract readReviewValidation Study
In one paragraph

Review in British journal of pharmacology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Matured hiPSC-derived cardiomyocytes possess dematuration plasticity.Journal of molecular and cellular cardiology plus · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Comparison of the Simulated Response of ThreeFrontiers in pharmacology · 2021
    Article
  5. Aryl Ether-Derived Sphingosine-1-Phosphate Receptor (S1PACS medicinal chemistry letters · 2020
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Comparative effects of parent and heated cinnamaldehyde on the function of human iPSC-derived cardiac myocytes.Toxicology in vitro : an international journal published in association with BIBRA · 2019
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Regenerative engineering and translational medicine · 2018
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jaffar M KhanRoyal Brompton and Harefield NHS Trust, London, UK National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College, London, UK.
Alexander R Lyon
Sian E Harding

Funding

British Heart Foundation FS/11/67/28954
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The current drug screening models are deficient, particularly in detecting cardiac side effects. Human stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes could aid both early cardiotoxicity detection and novel drug discovery. Work over the last decade has generated human embryonic stem cells as potentially accurate sources of human cardiomyocytes, but ethical constraints and poor efficacy in establishing cell lines limit their use. Induced pluripotent stem cells do not require the use of human embryos and have the added advantage of producing patient-specific cardiomyocytes, allowing both generic and disease- and patient-specific pharmacological screening, as well as drug development through disease modelling. A critical question is whether sufficient standards have been achieved in the reliable and reproducible generation of 'adult-like' cardiomyocytes from human fibroblast tissue to progress from validation to safe use in practice and drug discovery. This review will highlight the need for a new experimental system, assess the validity of human induced pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes and explore what the future may hold for their use in pharmacology.

Indexed as

AdultAnimalsCell DifferentiationCell LineDrug DesignDrug DiscoveryDrug Evaluation, PreclinicalEmbryonic Stem CellsFibroblastsHumansInduced Pluripotent Stem CellsMyocytes, CardiacReproducibility of ResultsToxicity Tests

Identifiers

PMID22845396
PMCPMC3651657

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.