Trial reportPloS one2012

Plasma cathepsin S and cystatin C levels and risk of abdominal aortic aneurysm: a randomized population-based study.

Bing-Jie Lv, Jes S Lindholt, Xiang Cheng, Jing Wang, Guo-Ping Shi

Open access · goldFull text readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in PloS one, 2012. The graph read 1 number from its abstract, feeding 1 cell of the map, but none could be read as for or against, so it casts no vote. Cited by 36 papers.

1number the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

Read, but not usablea number the graph found but could not read as for or against

Kidney outcomescomparator not stated · hypertension, dyslipidemiafeeds one cell of the map
OR 0.36P<0.001
Plasma cystatin C levels associated significantly, but negatively, with AAA (OR = 0.356, P<0.001).

clause the extractor read what became the number

2 · Its place on the map

Where it lands on the map

Rows are treatments, columns are outcomes. The coloured squares are the cells this paper feeds, coloured by the vote it casts there. Click one to jump to what this paper adds to it.

supports the treatmentfavours the comparatorno clear differenceread, but no usable result
3 · What it changes

What it adds to each cell

For every cell the paper feeds: the belief in the claim with and without this paper, and this paper's estimate drawn against every other readable study in the cell. The ringed dot is this paper.

Statins×kidney outcomes

No readable resultOpen on the map →What to test next →

4 readable studies in this cell: 0 favour the treatment, 3 find no difference, 1 favour the comparator.

Belief with this paper
0.00contested · 0 families support, 1 contradict · against placebo
Without itNot a counted family in this claim, so removing it changes nothing.
← favours the treatmentfavours the comparator →
1 · no effect
NCT023442907,769 enrolled · 2015
HR 0.600.14 to 2.51

This paper's own estimate is on a different scale from the rest of the cell, so it is not drawn here.

4 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

5 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 52 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Novel pharmacological approaches in abdominal aortic aneurysm.Clinical science (London, England : 1979) · 2023
    Review
  6. Role of Extracellular Matrix and Inflammation in Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Cysteinyl cathepsins in cardiovascular diseases.Biochimica et biophysica acta. Proteins and proteomics · 2020
    Review
  13. Pathogenic mechanisms and the potential of drug therapies for aortic aneurysm.American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology · 2020
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Plasma Cystatin B Association With Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms and Need for Later Surgical Repair: A Sub-study of the VIVA Trial.European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery : the official journal of the European Society for Vascular Surgery · 2018
    Article
  20. Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm: Evolving Controversies and Uncertainties.The International journal of angiology : official publication of the International College of Angiology, Inc · 2018
    Review
6 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

7 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Bing-Jie LvInstitute of Cardiology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College of Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Jes S Lindholt
Xiang Cheng
Jing Wang
Guo-Ping Shi
Brigham and Women's Hospital · USHarvard University · USHuazhong University of Science and Technology · CNRegionshospitalet Viborg · DKUnion Hospital · CN

Funding

Role of mast cells in obesityR01HL060942 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO · PI SHI, GUO-PING · 1999 to 2019
$5.6M
Role of Mast Cells in AtherosclerosisR01HL081090 · NHLBI · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI SHI, GUO-PING · 2007 to 2015
$3.3M
Role of mast cells in abdominal aortic aneurysmsR01HL088547 · NHLBI · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI SHI, GUO-PING · 2008 to 2011
$1.7M
NHLBI NIH HHS HL60942NHLBI NIH HHS HL81090NHLBI NIH HHS HL88547NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL060942NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL081090NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL088547
8 · The paper itself

Abstract

The marked sentences are the ones the graph read a number from.

backgroundHuman abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) lesions contain high levels of cathepsin S (CatS), but are deficient in its inhibitor, cystatin C. Whether plasma CatS and cystatin C levels are also altered in AAA patients remains unknown. METHODS AND

resultsPlasma samples were collected from 476 male AAA patients and 200 age-matched male controls to determine CatS and cystatin C levels by ELISA. Student's t test demonstrated higher plasma levels of total, active, and pro-CatS in AAA patients than in controls (P<0.001). ROC curve analysis confirmed higher plasma total, active, and pro-CatS levels in AAA patients than in controls (P<0.001). Logistic regression suggested that plasma total (odds ratio [OR] = 1.332), active (OR = 1.21), and pro-CatS (OR = 1.25) levels were independent AAA risk factors that associated positively with AAA (P<0.001). Plasma cystatin C levels associated significantly, but negatively, with AAA (OR = 0.356, P<0.001). Univariate correlation demonstrated that plasma total and active CatS levels correlated positively with body-mass index, diastolic blood pressure, and aortic diameter, but negatively with the lowest ankle-brachial index (ABI). Plasma cystatin C levels also correlated negatively with the lowest ABI. Multivariate linear regression showed that plasma total, active, and pro-CatS levels correlated positively with aortic diameter and negatively with the lowest ABI, whereas plasma cystatin C levels correlated negatively with aortic diameter and the lowest ABI, after adjusting for common AAA risk factors.

conclusionsCorrelation of plasma CatS and cystatin C with aortic diameter and the lowest ABI suggest these serological parameters as biomarkers for human peripheral arterial diseases and AAA.

Indexed as

AgedAortic Aneurysm, AbdominalBlood PressureCathepsinsCohort StudiesCystatin CHumansHydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase InhibitorsHypertensionMaleRisk FactorsSmokingcathepsin SCathepsinsCystatin CHydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID22844527
PMCPMC3402402
OpenAlexW2168700225

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.