ArticlePloS one2012
Analysing humanly generated random number sequences: a pattern-based approach.
Article in PloS one, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.
- Generated outcomes in risky choice reveal biased sampling and sequential dependencies.Communications psychology · 2026Article
- Random behavior is stable across tasks and time.Journal of experimental psychology. General · 2025Article
- A comparative evaluation of measures to assess randomness in human-generated sequences.Behavior research methods · 2024Article
- Article
- A time-series perspective on executive functioning: The benefits of a dynamic approach to random number generation.International journal of methods in psychiatric research · 2023Article
- Exploring randomness in autism.PeerJ · 2023Article
- Characterizing human random-sequence generation in competitive and non-competitive environments using Lempel-Ziv complexity.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- A cognitive fingerprint in human random number generation.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- The Morra Game as a Naturalistic Test Bed for Investigating Automatic and Voluntary Processes in Random Sequence Generation.Frontiers in psychology · 2020Article
- A parallel approximate string matching under Levenshtein distance on graphics processing units using warp-shuffle operations.PloS one · 2017Article
- Sequential information in a great ape utterance.Scientific reports · 2016Article
- Territorial raven pairs are sensitive to structural changes in simulated acoustic displays of conspecifics.Animal behaviour · 2016Article
- Heterogeneous Suppression of Sequential Effects in Random Sequence Generation, but Not in Operant Learning.PloS one · 2016Article
- An entity evolving into a community: defining the common ancestor and evolutionary trajectory of chronic lymphocytic leukemia stereotyped subset #4.Molecular medicine (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2015Article
- A Time Series Approach to Random Number Generation: Using Recurrence Quantification Analysis to Capture Executive Behavior.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2015Article
- Galvanic vestibular stimulation increases novelty in free selection of manual actions.Frontiers in integrative neuroscience · 2013Article
- Prevalence and knowledge of kidney disease risk factors among Nigerians resident in Lagos State Metropolitan District, South West Nigeria.Annals of African medicineArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In a random number generation task, participants are asked to generate a random sequence of numbers, most typically the digits 1 to 9. Such number sequences are not mathematically random, and both extent and type of bias allow one to characterize the brain's "internal random number generator". We assume that certain patterns and their variations will frequently occur in humanly generated random number sequences. Thus, we introduce a pattern-based analysis of random number sequences. Twenty healthy subjects randomly generated two sequences of 300 numbers each. Sequences were analysed to identify the patterns of numbers predominantly used by the subjects and to calculate the frequency of a specific pattern and its variations within the number sequence. This pattern analysis is based on the Damerau-Levenshtein distance, which counts the number of edit operations that are needed to convert one string into another. We built a model that predicts not only the next item in a humanly generated random number sequence based on the item's immediate history, but also the deployment of patterns in another sequence generated by the same subject. When a history of seven items was computed, the mean correct prediction rate rose up to 27% (with an individual maximum of 46%, chance performance of 11%). Furthermore, we assumed that when predicting one subject's sequence, predictions based on statistical information from the same subject should yield a higher success rate than predictions based on statistical information from a different subject. When provided with two sequences from the same subject and one from a different subject, an algorithm identifies the foreign sequence in up to 88% of the cases. In conclusion, the pattern-based analysis using the Levenshtein-Damarau distance is both able to predict humanly generated random number sequences and to identify person-specific information within a humanly generated random number sequence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.