ArticleOncology letters2012
Advantages of the quenching probe method over other PCR-based methods for detection of the JAK2 V617F mutation.
Article in Oncology letters, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- The molecular management of classic myeloproliferative neoplasm.Journal of the Egyptian National Cancer Institute · 2025Review
- Validating the Sensitivity of High-Resolution Melting Analysis for JAK2 V617F Mutation in the Clinical Setting.Journal of clinical laboratory analysis · 2016Article
- Establishment of a quenching probe method for detection ofOncology letters · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The detection of a V617F mutation (G to T exchange at nucleotide 1,849) in the JAK2 gene is crucial for the diagnosis of myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN) such as polycythemia vera. Although sequence analysis is the standard method for detection, it is not suitable for clinical examinations due to the requirement of expensive equipment. In this study, we evaluated the efficiencies of four PCR-based methods to detect JAK2 V617F: allele-specific PCR (AS-PCR), PCR-restriction fragment length polymorphism (PCR-RFLP), high-resolution melting analysis (HRM) and the quenching probe method (QP). The HEL cell line, which harbors a homozygous JAK2 V617F mutation, as well as bone marrow samples from 16 MPN patients and normal control samples, were used in this assessment. The sensitivity of the detection limit of all four methods was also examined using samples of HEL cells mixed in a variety of ratios with cells containing wild-type JAK2. The results of all four methods were found to be concordant. AS-PCR was shown to be the most sensitive; however, it produced false positive results. Although PCR-RFLP demonstrated high specificity, it was time consuming. By contrast, results were obtained using HRM and QP in only 2 h. It was easier to recognize the curves derived from the mutant allele obtained using QP. QP is also suitable for the rough estimation of allele burden. JAK2 V617F assays are mainly used for diagnosis at presentation in clinical settings. We therefore conclude that in situations where high sensitivity is not required, QP is the preferable method for the detection of JAK2 V617F. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report to demonstrate the efficiency of the QP method for the detection of JAK2 V617F using a standard thermal cycler.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.