ArticlePLoS computational biology2012
Genome-wide localization of protein-DNA binding and histone modification by a Bayesian change-point method with ChIP-seq data.
Article in PLoS computational biology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
30 citing papers in PubMed.
- Towards personalized epigenomics: learning shared chromatin landscapes and joint de-noising of histone modification assays.NAR genomics and bioinformatics · 2025Article
- Distinct BMP-Smad signaling outputs confer diverse functions in dental mesenchyme.Development (Cambridge, England) · 2025Article
- A unified hypothesis-free feature extraction framework for diverse epigenomic data.Bioinformatics advances · 2025Article
- Multiplex-GAM: genome-wide identification of chromatin contacts yields insights overlooked by Hi-C.Nature methods · 2023Article
- Dynamic antagonism between key repressive pathways maintains the placental epigenome.Nature cell biology · 2023Article
- Article
- Article
- A flexible ChIP-sequencing simulation toolkit.BMC bioinformatics · 2021Article
- Deciphering hierarchical organization of topologically associated domains through change-point testing.BMC bioinformatics · 2021Article
- Seq-ing answers: Current data integration approaches to uncover mechanisms of transcriptional regulation.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2020Review
- Article
- RECAP reveals the true statistical significance of ChIP-seq peak calls.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2019Article
- A map of direct TF-DNA interactions in the human genome.Nucleic acids research · 2019Article
- ChromTime: modeling spatio-temporal dynamics of chromatin marks.Genome biology · 2018Article
- Methionine metabolism influences genomic architecture and gene expression through H3K4me3 peak width.Nature communications · 2018Article
- Genome-wide analysis of PDX1 target genes in human pancreatic progenitors.Molecular metabolism · 2018Article
- Clustering-local-unique-enriched-signals (CLUES) promotes identification of novel regulators of ES cell self-renewal and pluripotency.PloS one · 2018Article
- RNA polymerase II primes Polycomb-repressed developmental genes throughout terminal neuronal differentiation.Molecular systems biology · 2017Article
- The Short Isoform of BRD4 Promotes HIV-1 Latency by Engaging Repressive SWI/SNF Chromatin-Remodeling Complexes.Molecular cell · 2017Article
- Flipping between Polycomb repressed and active transcriptional states introduces noise in gene expression.Nature communications · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Next-generation sequencing (NGS) technologies have matured considerably since their introduction and a focus has been placed on developing sophisticated analytical tools to deal with the amassing volumes of data. Chromatin immunoprecipitation sequencing (ChIP-seq), a major application of NGS, is a widely adopted technique for examining protein-DNA interactions and is commonly used to investigate epigenetic signatures of diffuse histone marks. These datasets have notoriously high variance and subtle levels of enrichment across large expanses, making them exceedingly difficult to define. Windows-based, heuristic models and finite-state hidden Markov models (HMMs) have been used with some success in analyzing ChIP-seq data but with lingering limitations. To improve the ability to detect broad regions of enrichment, we developed a stochastic Bayesian Change-Point (BCP) method, which addresses some of these unresolved issues. BCP makes use of recent advances in infinite-state HMMs by obtaining explicit formulas for posterior means of read densities. These posterior means can be used to categorize the genome into enriched and unenriched segments, as is customarily done, or examined for more detailed relationships since the underlying subpeaks are preserved rather than simplified into a binary classification. BCP performs a near exhaustive search of all possible change points between different posterior means at high-resolution to minimize the subjectivity of window sizes and is computationally efficient, due to a speed-up algorithm and the explicit formulas it employs. In the absence of a well-established "gold standard" for diffuse histone mark enrichment, we corroborated BCP's island detection accuracy and reproducibility using various forms of empirical evidence. We show that BCP is especially suited for analysis of diffuse histone ChIP-seq data but also effective in analyzing punctate transcription factor ChIP datasets, making it widely applicable for numerous experiment types.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.