ArticleJournal of applied behavior analysis2012
Effects of a motivating operation manipulation on the maintenance of mands.
Article in Journal of applied behavior analysis, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Tutorial on Indicating Responses and Their Importance in Mand Training.Behavior analysis in practice · 2024Article
- POWER: A Caregiver Implemented Mand Training Intervention.Behavior analysis in practice · 2022Article
- Empirical Application of Skinner's Verbal Behavior to Interventions for Children with Autism: A Review.The Analysis of verbal behavior · 2017Article
- A Staff-Training Program to Increase Spontaneous Vocal Requests in Children With Autism.Behavior analysis in practice · 2013Article
- Increasing the mand repertoire of children with autism through the use of an interrupted chain procedure.Behavior analysis in practice · 2012Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issuedERRATUM.2020
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We assessed the maintenance of newly acquired mands under presession reinforcer access (reinforcer efficacy abolished) and no presession reinforcer access (reinforcer efficacy established) conditions with 3 children with autism spectrum disorder. Results suggested that the no presession access condition established the value of the reinforcer and evoked responding relative to the presession access condition. Results are discussed in the context of implications for assessing maintenance of previously acquired skills.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.