Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22843515›Full record

ReviewCurrent oncology reports2012

Active immunotherapy: current state of the art in vaccine approaches for NHL.

M Lia Palomba

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current oncology reports, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. The role of DNA mismatch repair in immunotherapy of human cancer.International journal of biological sciences · 2022
    Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

M Lia PalombaLymphoma Service, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA. Palombam@MSKCC.ORG

Funding

Variability of Cellular Responses to Growth Factors and Drugs During TumorgenesisU54CA148967 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INST CAN RESEARCH · PI ALTAN-BONNET, GREGOIRE · 2010 to 2014
$13.8M
NCI NIH HHS U54 CA148967
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Immune therapy of cancer is a rapidly evolving field, with long-deserved successes now finally achieved. As new pathways triggered by the immune synapsis are elucidated, and new molecules responsible for immune checkpoints are being discovered, it is becoming clear that vaccination against a single antigen aided by non-specific immune stimulation is not sufficient for an efficient, long term, immune response. Though lymphoma is a highly curable malignancy, there is still a subset of patients that is at very high risk of disease relapse even after successfully completing chemotherapy or a stem cell transplant. Patients with minimal residual disease are particularly suitable for vaccination. Over the past 3 decades, the classic model of lymphoma-specific idiotype vaccine has evolved and recent data on vaccination with nonspecific oligodeoxynucleotides has provided very encouraging results. Furthermore, the introduction of checkpoint blockade via agonist or antagonist monoclonal antibodies holds the promise of significant improvement in the efficacy of future vaccines. What follows is a brief summary of the historical highlights in lymphoma immunotherapy as well as an update on the most recently published clinical trials and a look at future developments.

Indexed as

Antibodies, BlockingCancer VaccinesCell Cycle CheckpointsChemotherapy, AdjuvantClinical Trials as TopicHumansImmunoglobulin IdiotypesImmunotherapy, ActiveLymphoma, Non-HodgkinVaccinationAntibodies, BlockingCancer VaccinesImmunoglobulin Idiotypes

Identifiers

PMID22843515
PMCPMC3441177

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.