Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22843284›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology2012

Detection of Legionella pneumophila on clinical samples and susceptibility assessment by flow cytometry.

I Faria-Ramos, S Costa-de-Oliveira, J Barbosa, A Cardoso, J Santos-Antunes, A G Rodrigues, C Pina-Vaz

Abstract readEvaluation Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 92% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

I Faria-RamosDepartment of Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, 4200-319, Porto, Portugal.
S Costa-de-Oliveira
J Barbosa
A Cardoso
J Santos-Antunes
A G Rodrigues
C Pina-Vaz
Universidade do Porto · PTHospital de São João · PT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Culture in selective media represents the standard diagnostic method to confirm Legionella pneumophila infection, despite requiring a prolonged incubation period; antigen detection by immunofluorescence (IFS) and molecular techniques are also available, but they do not allow antimicrobial susceptibility evaluation. Our objective was to optimise flow cytometry (FC) protocols for the detection of L. pneumophila in respiratory samples and for susceptibility evaluation to first-line drugs. In order to optimise the FC protocol, a specific monoclonal antibody, conjugated with fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC), was incubated with type strain L. pneumophila ATCC 33152. The limit of detection was established by analysing serial dilutions of bacterial suspension; specificity was assayed using mixtures of prokaryotic and eukaryotic microorganisms. The optimised FC protocol was used to assess 50 respiratory samples and compared with IFS evaluation. The susceptibility profile to erythromycin, ciprofloxacin and levofloxacin was evaluated by FC using propidium iodide and SYBR Green fluorescent dyes; the results were compared with the Etest afterwards. The optimal specific antibody concentration was 20 μg/ml; 10(2)/ml Legionella organisms were detected by this protocol and no cross-reactions with other microorganisms were detected. The five positive respiratory samples (10 %) determined by IFS were also detected by FC, showing 100 % correlation. After 1 h of incubation at 37 °C with different antimicrobials, SYBR Green staining could discriminate between treated and non-treated cells. A novel flow cytometric approach for the detection of L. pneumophila from clinical samples and susceptibility evaluation is now available, representing an important step forward for the diagnosis of this very relevant agent.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsAntibodies, BacterialAntibodies, MonoclonalCross ReactionsFlow CytometryFluorescenceFluorescent DyesHumansLegionella pneumophilaLegionnaires' DiseaseMicrobial Sensitivity TestsSensitivity and SpecificityStaining and LabelingAnti-Bacterial AgentsAntibodies, BacterialAntibodies, MonoclonalFluorescent Dyes

Identifiers

PMID22843284
OpenAlexW2027914163

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.