Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22843167›Full record

ArticleJournal of materials science. Materials in medicine2012

Overcoming hypoxia in 3D culture systems for tissue engineering of bone in vitro using an automated, oxygen-triggered feedback loop.

Elias Volkmer, Sven Otto, Hans Polzer, Maximilian Saller, Daniel Trappendreher, Darin Zagar, Sabine Hamisch, Günter Ziegler, Arndt Wilhelmi, Wolf Mutschler and 1 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Chondrocytes In Vitro Systems Allowing Study of OA.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Elias VolkmerDepartment of Surgery, Experimental Surgery and Regenerative Medicine, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany. Elias.Volkmer@med.uni-muenchen.de
Sven Otto
Hans Polzer
Maximilian Saller
Daniel Trappendreher
Darin Zagar
Sabine Hamisch
Günter Ziegler
Arndt Wilhelmi
Wolf Mutschler
Matthias Schieker

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tissue engineering is an attractive approach to heal bony defects. However, three-dimensional cell-scaffold constructs display uneven oxygen supply resulting in inhomogeneous tissue quality. We assessed different strategies to improve oxygen supply in vitro. Scaffolds with differing inner surface were seeded with preosteoblastic cells and cultivated either statically or in perfusion bioreactors. Oxygen concentration and pH were measured in the center of the scaffolds. An inductive feedback mechanism was build to increase bioreactor pump speed according to the oxygen concentrations measured within the scaffolds. While pH remained stable, oxygen concentration decreased significantly under static conditions within the cell-seeded scaffolds. Reducing the scaffolds' inner surface as well as increasing perfusion speeds in bioreactors resulted in improved oxygen supply. We conclude that improving oxygen supply to three dimensional culture systems for bone tissue engineering is feasible in an automated manner. Culture conditions have to be adapted to each cell-scaffold system individually.

Indexed as

AutomationCell HypoxiaTissue Engineering3T3 CellsAnimalsBioreactorsBone and BonesCell Culture TechniquesHydrogen-Ion ConcentrationMiceOxygenTissue ScaffoldsOxygen

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.