ArticleSurgery today2013
Impact of magnetic resonance in the preoperative staging and the surgical planning for treating small bowel neoplasms.
Article in Surgery today, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- A Systematic Review of Technical Parameters for MR of the Small Bowel in non-IBD Conditions over the Last Ten Years.Scientific reports · 2019Pooled it
- Intestinal obstruction caused by early stage primary ileum adenocarcinoma: A case report and review of literature.World journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2025Article
- Ileal adenocarcinoma in a young pregnant woman: A rare case report.Frontiers in oncology · 2023Article
- Small Bowel Neoplasms and Polyps.Current gastroenterology reports · 2016Review
- Small bowel carcinoid: Location isn't everything!World journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2013Article
- Prospective evaluation of magnetic resonance enterography for the detection of mesenteric small bowel tumours.European radiology · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe role of MR enteroclysis/enterography (MRE) in the diagnosis of small bowel (SB) tumor has not been fully evaluated. The aims of this study were to assess the capability of MRE correctly identifying the site, stage and histology of such neoplasms.
methodsMR enteroclysis/enterography was employed in consecutive patients suspected of having an SB tumor following negative upper and lower endoscopies. The SB was subdivided into proximal jejunum, middle SB and distal ileum. The histological examination (HE) of the surgical specimen was the reference standard.
resultsOne hundred and fifty-eight patients were examined. Thirty-one out of 32 (96.9 %) SB detected by HE were correctly identified by MRE. The concordance rate between MRE and HE was 100 % for localization, and 87.1, 80.6 and 96.8 % for T, N and M stages, respectively. The concordance rate was 62.2 % for histological diagnosis.
conclusionsThe high concordance rates between MRE and HE for the localization of SB tumors and for their staging have a significant impact upon surgical planning, particularly if laparoscopy is being considered. A preoperative histological diagnosis is not sufficiently reliable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
22843117What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.