ArticleThe journal of headache and pain2012
An electronic diary on a palm device for headache monitoring: a preliminary experience.
Article in The journal of headache and pain, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04828941 (A 26-week Randomized Clinical Trial of an Electronic Headache Diary in Migraine Patients), which is not on this map. Cited by 17 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A 26-week Randomized Clinical Trial of an Electronic Headache Diary in Migraine Patients
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.
- Approach to headache disorders and the management of migraine: consensus guidelines from the Headache Society of Singapore, first edition (2023).Singapore medical journal · 2026Guideline
- Pain Management Mobile Applications: A Systematic Review of Commercial and Research Efforts.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Pooled it
- Electronic Data Capture Versus Conventional Data Collection Methods in Clinical Pain Studies: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of medical Internet research · 2020Pooled it
- Comparison of self-administered survey questionnaire responses collected using mobile apps versus other methods.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2015Pooled it
- Pooled it
- mHealth: a strategic field without a solid scientific soul. a systematic review of pain-related apps.PloS one · 2014Pooled it
- Evaluation of a mobile voiding diary for pediatric patients with voiding dysfunction: a prospective comparative study.The Journal of urology · 2014Trial
- Hallmarks of primary headache: part 2- Tension-type headache.The journal of headache and pain · 2025Review
- Validation of a Digital Headache Calendar at a Tertiary Referral Center.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Towards eHealth to support the health journey of headache patients: a scoping review.Journal of neurology · 2021Article
- Preferences for Use and Design of Electronic Patient-Reported Outcomes in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.The patient · 2019Article
- Not Just a Headache: Qualitative Study About Web-Based Self-Presentation and Social Media Use by People With Migraine.Journal of medical Internet research · 2019Article
- Development and validation of a pain monitoring app for patients with musculoskeletal conditions (The Keele pain recorder feasibility study).BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2019Article
- A decision support system to follow up and diagnose primary headache patients using semantically enriched data.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2018Article
- Treatment diary for botulinum toxin spasticity treatment: a pilot study.International journal of rehabilitation research. Internationale Zeitschrift fur Rehabilitationsforschung. Revue internationale de recherches de readaptation · 2017Article
- Testing the Feasibility and Psychometric Properties of a Mobile Diary (myWHI) in Adolescents and Young Adults With Headaches.JMIR mHealth and uHealth · 2015Article
- Commercially available mobile phone headache diary apps: a systematic review.JMIR mHealth and uHealth · 2014Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Patients suffering from headache are usually asked to use charts to allow monitoring of their disease. These diaries, providing they are regularly filled in, become crucial in the diagnosis and management of headache disorders because they provide further information on attack frequency and temporal pattern, drug intake, trigger factors, and short-/long-term responses to treatment. Electronic tools could facilitate diary monitoring and thus the management of headaches. Medication overuse headache (MOH) is a chronic and disabling condition that can be treated by withdrawing the overused drug(s) and adopting specific approaches that focus on the development of a close doctor-patient relationship in the post-withdrawal phase. Although the headache diary is, in this context, an essential tool for the constant, reliable monitoring of these patients to prevent relapses, very little is known about the applicability of electronic diaries in MOH patients. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the acceptability of and patient compliance with an electronic headache diary (palm device) as compared with a traditional diary chart in a group of headache inpatients with MOH. A palm diary device, developed in accordance with the ICHD-II criteria, was given to 85 MOH inpatients during the detoxification phase. On the first day of hospitalization, the patients were instructed in the use of the diary and were then required to fill it in daily for the following 7 days. Data on the patients' opinions on the electronic diary and the instructions given, its screen and layout, as well as its convenience and ease of use, in comparison with the traditional paper version, were collected using a numerical rating scale. A total of 504 days with headache were recorded in both the electronic and the traditional headache diaries simultaneously. The level of patient compliance was good. The patients appreciated the electronic headache diary, deeming it easy to understand and to use (fill in); most of the patients rated the palm device handier than the traditional paper version.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.