Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22842873›Full record

ArticleThe journal of headache and pain2012

An electronic diary on a palm device for headache monitoring: a preliminary experience.

Marta Allena, Maria Giovanna Cuzzoni, Cristina Tassorelli, Giuseppe Nappi, Fabio Antonaci

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The journal of headache and pain, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04828941 (A 26-week Randomized Clinical Trial of an Electronic Headache Diary in Migraine Patients), which is not on this map. Cited by 17 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04828941 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

A 26-week Randomized Clinical Trial of an Electronic Headache Diary in Migraine Patients

TypeinterventionalSponsorUnidade Local de Saúde de Matosinhos, EPERan2021 to 2021Enrolled60ConditionsEpisodic Migraine, Migraine DisordersArmsElectronic Headache Diary, Paper Diary
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Treatment diary for botulinum toxin spasticity treatment: a pilot study.International journal of rehabilitation research. Internationale Zeitschrift fur Rehabilitationsforschung. Revue internationale de recherches de readaptation · 2017
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Marta AllenaHeadache Science Centre, C. Mondino National Institute of Neurology Foundation IRCCS, Pavia, Italy.
Maria Giovanna Cuzzoni
Cristina Tassorelli
Giuseppe Nappi
Fabio Antonaci
Fondazione Istituto Neurologico Nazionale Casimiro Mondino · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Patients suffering from headache are usually asked to use charts to allow monitoring of their disease. These diaries, providing they are regularly filled in, become crucial in the diagnosis and management of headache disorders because they provide further information on attack frequency and temporal pattern, drug intake, trigger factors, and short-/long-term responses to treatment. Electronic tools could facilitate diary monitoring and thus the management of headaches. Medication overuse headache (MOH) is a chronic and disabling condition that can be treated by withdrawing the overused drug(s) and adopting specific approaches that focus on the development of a close doctor-patient relationship in the post-withdrawal phase. Although the headache diary is, in this context, an essential tool for the constant, reliable monitoring of these patients to prevent relapses, very little is known about the applicability of electronic diaries in MOH patients. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the acceptability of and patient compliance with an electronic headache diary (palm device) as compared with a traditional diary chart in a group of headache inpatients with MOH. A palm diary device, developed in accordance with the ICHD-II criteria, was given to 85 MOH inpatients during the detoxification phase. On the first day of hospitalization, the patients were instructed in the use of the diary and were then required to fill it in daily for the following 7 days. Data on the patients' opinions on the electronic diary and the instructions given, its screen and layout, as well as its convenience and ease of use, in comparison with the traditional paper version, were collected using a numerical rating scale. A total of 504 days with headache were recorded in both the electronic and the traditional headache diaries simultaneously. The level of patient compliance was good. The patients appreciated the electronic headache diary, deeming it easy to understand and to use (fill in); most of the patients rated the palm device handier than the traditional paper version.

Indexed as

Computers, HandheldHeadacheMedical RecordsAdultAnalgesicsFemaleHumansMalePatient Acceptance of Health CareAnalgesics

Identifiers

PMID22842873
PMCPMC3444534
OpenAlexW1977956219

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.