ArticleJournal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996)2013
70th Birthday symposium of Prof. Dr. Riederer: autologous adult stem cells in ischemic and traumatic CNS disorders.
Article in Journal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996), 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Neuro-Cells therapy improves motor outcomes and suppresses inflammation during experimental syndrome of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis in mice.CNS neuroscience & therapeutics · 2020Article
- Therapeutic role of hematopoietic stem cells in autism spectrum disorder-related inflammation.Frontiers in immunology · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Ischemic and traumatic insults of the central nervous system both result in definite chronic disability, only to some extent responsive to rehabilitation. Recently, the application of autologous stem cells (fresh bone marrow-derived mononuclear cells including mesenchymal and hematopoietic stem cells) was suggested to provide a strategy to further improve neurological recovery in these disorders. During the acute phase, stem cells act mainly by neuroprotection with prevention of apoptosis, whereas during the chronic situation they provide neurorestoration by transdifferentiation and/or the secretion of neurotrophic factors. To reach these goals, in the acute phase, stem cells (10 million mononuclear cells per kg body weight) might be best applied intravenously, as during the first 7 days after the lesion, the blood-brain barrier permits passage of cells from the blood into the brain or the spinal cord. In the more chronic situation, though, those cells might be applied best intrathecally by lumbar puncture. Based on the reported results so far, it seems justified to develop well-designed clinical double-blind trials in chronic spinal cord injury and ischemic stroke patients, as efficacy and safety concerns might not be answered by preclinical studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
22842676What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.