Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22841641›Full record

Trial reportResearch in social & administrative pharmacy : RSAP

Recruitment of community pharmacies in a randomized trial to generate patient referrals to the tobacco quitline.

Robin L Corelli, Alan J Zillich, Carl de Moor, Margherita R Giuliano, Jennifer Arnold, Christine M Fenlon, Cami L Douglas, Brooke Magnusson, Susan M Zbikowski, Alexander V Prokhorov and 1 more

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Research in social & administrative pharmacy : RSAP. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Community pharmacy personnel interventions for smoking cessation.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2019
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Robin L CorelliDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, 521 Parnassus Avenue, University of California-San Francisco, CA 94143, USA.
Alan J Zillich
Carl de Moor
Margherita R Giuliano
Jennifer Arnold
Christine M Fenlon
Cami L Douglas
Brooke Magnusson
Susan M Zbikowski
Alexander V Prokhorov
Karen Suchanek Hudmon
University of Indianapolis · USIndiana University – Purdue University Indianapolis · USThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USUniversity of California, San Francisco · USWashington State Department of Agriculture · US

Funding

ASK, ADVISE, REFER: Promoting Pharmacy-based Referrals to Tobacco QuitlinesR01CA129312 · NCI · PURDUE UNIVERSITY · PI HUDMON, KAREN S · 2008 to 2010
$1.1M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA 129312NCI NIH HHS R01 CA129312
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCommunity pharmacies have the potential to reduce the prevalence of tobacco use, yet most pharmacies do not integrate cessation activities into routine practice.

objectivesThe objective of this study was to describe the recruitment strategy and participant yield for a 2-state, randomized trial evaluating 2 intervention approaches for increasing pharmacy-based referrals to tobacco quitlines.

methodsDetailed study recruitment tracking forms were used to document all contact attempts between the study investigators and each potential study site. These data were analyzed to characterize the overall recruitment and consent process for community pharmacies and pharmacy personnel (pharmacists, technicians).

resultsAchieving the target sample size of 64 study sites required contacting a total of 150 pharmacies (84 independent and 66 chain). Excluding 22 ineligible pharmacies, participation rates were 49% (32 of 65) for independent pharmacies and 51% (32 of 63) for chain pharmacies (50% overall). Across the 64 participating pharmacies, a total of 124 pharmacists (of 171; 73%) and 127 pharmacy technicians (of 215; 59%) were enrolled in the study. Pharmacies that chose not to participate most often cited time constraints as the primary reason. Overall, combining both the recruitment and consent process, a median of 5 contacts were made with each participating pharmacy (range, 2-19; interquartile range [IQR], 4-7), and the median overall duration of time elapsed from initial contact to consent was 25 days (range, 3-122 days; IQR, 12-47 days).

conclusionsResults from this study suggest that community pharmacy personnel are receptive to participation in multisite, tobacco cessation clinical research trials. However, execution of a representative sampling and recruitment scheme for a multistate study in this practice setting is a time- and labor-intensive process.

Indexed as

Community Pharmacy ServicesReferral and ConsultationConnecticutHumansPharmacistsPharmacy TechniciansSmoking CessationWashingtonBrief interventionCommunity pharmacyPharmacistPharmacy technicianQuitlineSmokingSmoking cessationTobaccoTobacco cessation

Identifiers

PMID22841641
PMCPMC3554859
OpenAlexW2090790080

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.