Trial reportAmerican journal of obstetrics and gynecology2012
A randomized trial of birthing with and without stirrups.
Trial report in American journal of obstetrics and gynecology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Perineal techniques during the second stage of labour for reducing perineal trauma.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2017Pooled it
- Position in the second stage of labour for women without epidural anaesthesia.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2017Pooled it
- Navigating maternity health care: a survey of the Canadian prairie newcomer experience.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveThe objective of the study was to determine whether bed delivery without stirrups reduces the incidence of perineal lacerations compared with delivery in stirrups. STUDY
designIn this randomized trial, we compared bed delivery without stirrups with delivery in stirrups in nulliparous women. The primary outcome was any perineal laceration (first through fourth degree).
resultsOne hundred eight women were randomized to delivery without stirrups and 106 to stirrups. A total of 82 women randomized to no stirrups (76%) sustained perineal lacerations compared with 83 in women allocated to stirrups (78%) (P = .8). There was no significant difference in the severity of lacerations or in obstetric outcomes such as prolonged second stage of labor, forceps delivery, or cesarean birth. Similarly, infant outcomes were unaffected.
conclusionOur results do not incriminate stirrups as a cause of perineal lacerations. Alternatively, our findings of no difference in perineal lacerations suggest that delivering in bed without stirrups confers no advantages or disadvantages.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.