Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22840598›Full record

ReviewSeminars in nuclear medicine2012

Functional imaging for prostate cancer: therapeutic implications.

Carina Mari Aparici, Youngho Seo

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Seminars in nuclear medicine, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. A Feasibility Study Showing [Molecular imaging and biology · 2016
    Trial
  2. The Dandelion Dilemma Revisited for Oligoprogression: Treat the Whole Lawn or Weed Selectively?Clinical oncology (Royal College of Radiologists (Great Britain)) · 2019
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Current Status of Hybrid PET/MRI in Oncologic Imaging.AJR. American journal of roentgenology · 2016
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Localization and restaging of carcinoma prostate byIndian journal of urology : IJU : journal of the Urological Society of India
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Carina Mari ApariciDepartment of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, and Nuclear Medicine Service, San Francisco Veterans Affairs Medical Center, San Francisco, CA 94107, USA.
Youngho Seo
University of California, Berkeley · USUniversity of California, San Francisco · US

Funding

Prostate Cancer Management with Multi-Modality ImagingK25CA114254 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI SEO, YOUNGHO · 2006 to 2010
$780k
NCI NIH HHS K25 CA114254NCI NIH HHS K25 CA114254-04S1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Functional radionuclide imaging modalities, now commonly combined with anatomical imaging modalities computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (single photon emission computed tomography [SPECT]/CT, positron emission tomography [PET]/CT, and PET/magnetic resonance imaging), are promising tools for the management of prostate cancer, particularly for therapeutic implications. Sensitive detection capability of prostate cancer using these imaging modalities is one issue; however, the treatment of prostate cancer using the information that can be obtained from functional radionuclide imaging techniques is another challenging area. There are not many SPECT or PET radiotracers that can cover the full spectrum of the management of prostate cancer from initial detection to staging, prognosis predictor, and all the way to treatment response assessment. However, when used appropriately, the information from functional radionuclide imaging improves, and sometimes significantly changes, the whole course of the cancer management. The limitations of using SPECT and PET radiotracers with regard to therapeutic implications are not so much different from their limitations solely for the task of detecting prostate cancer; however, the specific imaging target and how this target is reliably imaged by SPECT and PET can potentially make significant impact in the treatment of prostate cancer. Finally, although the localized prostate cancer is considered manageable, there is still significant need for improvement in noninvasive imaging of metastatic prostate cancer, in treatment guidance, and in response assessment from functional imaging, including radionuclide-based techniques. In this review article, we present the rationale of using functional radionuclide imaging and the therapeutic implications for each of radionuclide imaging agent that have been studied in human subjects.

Indexed as

AnimalsHumansMaleProstatic NeoplasmsRadionuclide Imaging

Identifiers

PMID22840598
PMCPMC3408625
OpenAlexW1964358047

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.