Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22839576›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2012

Genome-wide identification of significant aberrations in cancer genome.

Xiguo Yuan, Guoqiang Yu, Xuchu Hou, Ie-Ming Shih, Robert Clarke, Junying Zhang, Eric P Hoffman, Roger R Wang, Zhen Zhang, Yue Wang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Integration of Network Biology and Imaging to Study Cancer Phenotypes and Responses.IEEE/ACM transactions on computational biology and bioinformatics
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.

Xiguo YuanSchool of Computer Science and Technology, Xidian University, Xi'an, P R China.
Guoqiang Yu
Xuchu Hou
Ie-Ming Shih
Robert Clarke
Junying Zhang
Eric P Hoffman
Roger R Wang
Zhen Zhang
Yue Wang
Johns Hopkins University · USVirginia Tech · USXidian University · CNChildren's National · USGeorgetown University Medical Center · USMontgomery High School · USStanford University · US

Funding

Proteome Characterization Center: A Genoproteomics Pipeline for Cance ResearchU24CA160036 · NCI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI CHAN, DANIEL WANYUI, ZHANG, HUI · 2011 to 2016
$10.7M
Novel Targets in Endocrine ResponsivenessU54CA149147 · NCI · GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY · PI CLARKE, ROBERT R. · 2010 to 2014
$6.9M
Improved Diagnostic of the Muscular DystrophiesR01NS029525 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI HOFFMAN, ERIC P. · 1991 to 2015
$6.5M
Machine learning to identify predictive SNPs and complex interaction effectsR21GM085665 · NIGMS · VIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INST AND ST UNIV · PI WANG, YUE · 2009 to 2010
$434k
NCI NIH HHS CA149147NCI NIH HHS CA160036NIGMS NIH HHS GM085665NINDS NIH HHS NS029525NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS029525
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSomatic Copy Number Alterations (CNAs) in human genomes are present in almost all human cancers. Systematic efforts to characterize such structural variants must effectively distinguish significant consensus events from random background aberrations. Here we introduce Significant Aberration in Cancer (SAIC), a new method for characterizing and assessing the statistical significance of recurrent CNA units. Three main features of SAIC include: (1) exploiting the intrinsic correlation among consecutive probes to assign a score to each CNA unit instead of single probes; (2) performing permutations on CNA units that preserve correlations inherent in the copy number data; and (3) iteratively detecting Significant Copy Number Aberrations (SCAs) and estimating an unbiased null distribution by applying an SCA-exclusive permutation scheme.

resultsWe test and compare the performance of SAIC against four peer methods (GISTIC, STAC, KC-SMART, CMDS) on a large number of simulation datasets. Experimental results show that SAIC outperforms peer methods in terms of larger area under the Receiver Operating Characteristics curve and increased detection power. We then apply SAIC to analyze structural genomic aberrations acquired in four real cancer genome-wide copy number data sets (ovarian cancer, metastatic prostate cancer, lung adenocarcinoma, glioblastoma). When compared with previously reported results, SAIC successfully identifies most SCAs known to be of biological significance and associated with oncogenes (e.g., KRAS, CCNE1, and MYC) or tumor suppressor genes (e.g., CDKN2A/B). Furthermore, SAIC identifies a number of novel SCAs in these copy number data that encompass tumor related genes and may warrant further studies.

conclusionsSupported by a well-grounded theoretical framework, SAIC has been developed and used to identify SCAs in various cancer copy number data sets, providing useful information to study the landscape of cancer genomes. Open-source and platform-independent SAIC software is implemented using C++, together with R scripts for data formatting and Perl scripts for user interfacing, and it is easy to install and efficient to use. The source code and documentation are freely available at http://www.cbil.ece.vt.edu/software.htm.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsComputer SimulationDatabases, GeneticDNA Copy Number VariationsFemaleGenome, HumanHumansMaleModels, GeneticNeoplasmsOncogenes

Identifiers

PMID22839576
PMCPMC3428679
OpenAlexW2153631649

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.