Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22838959›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2012

Road traffic related mortality in Vietnam: evidence for policy from a national sample mortality surveillance system.

Anh D Ngo, Chalapati Rao, Nguyen Phuong Hoa, Damian G Hoy, Khieu Thi Quynh Trang, Peter S Hill

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
8.3field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 88 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Analysis of Hospital Costs in Road Traffic Injuries.Bulletin of emergency and trauma · 2021
    Article
  13. Epidemiologic study of traffic crash mortality among motorcycle users in Iran (2011-2017).Chinese journal of traumatology = Zhonghua chuang shang za zhi · 2020
    Article
  14. Magnitude, trends and prevention of road traffic accidents in the Republic of South Africa.South African family practice : official journal of the South African Academy of Family Practice/Primary Care · 2020
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Evaluation of an integrated multisector campaign to increase child helmet use in Vietnam.Injury prevention : journal of the International Society for Child and Adolescent Injury Prevention · 2019
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Anh D NgoSocial Epidemiology and Evaluation Research Group, School of Health Sciences, University of South Australia, Room P4-23, Playford Building, City East Campus, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia. Anh.Ngo@unisa.edu.au
Chalapati Rao
Nguyen Phuong Hoa
Damian G Hoy
Khieu Thi Quynh Trang
Peter S Hill
University of Queensland · AUHanoi Medical University · VNMinistry of Health · VNUniversity of South Australia · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRoad traffic injuries (RTIs) are among the leading causes of mortality in Vietnam. However, mortality data collection systems in Vietnam in general and for RTIs in particular, remain inconsistent and incomplete. Underlying distributions of external causes and body injuries are not available from routine data collection systems or from studies till date. This paper presents characteristics, user type pattern, seasonal distribution, and causes of 1,061 deaths attributable to road crashes ascertained from a national sample mortality surveillance system in Vietnam over a two-year period (2008 and 2009).

methodsA sample mortality surveillance system was designed for Vietnam, comprising 192 communes in 16 provinces, accounting for approximately 3% of the Vietnamese population. Deaths were identified from commune level data sources, and followed up by verbal autopsy (VA) based ascertainment of cause of death. Age-standardised mortality rates from RTIs were computed. VA questionnaires were analysed in depth to derive descriptive characteristics of RTI deaths in the sample.

resultsThe age-standardized mortality rates from RTIs were 33.5 and 8.5 per 100,000 for males and females respectively. Majority of deaths were males (79%). Seventy three percent of all deaths were aged from 15 to 49 years and 58% were motorcycle users. As high as 80% of deaths occurred on the day of injury, 42% occurred prior to arrival at hospital, and a further 29% occurred on-site. Direct causes of death were identified for 446 deaths (42%) with head injuries being the most common cause attributable to road traffic injuries overall (79%) and to motorcycle crashes in particular (78%).

conclusionThe VA method can provide a useful data source to analyse RTI mortality. The observed considerable mortality from head injuries among motorcycle users highlights the need to evaluate current practice and effectiveness of motorcycle helmet use in Vietnam. The high number of deaths occurring on-site or prior to hospital admission indicates a need for effective pre-hospital first aid services and timely access to emergency facilities. In the absence of standardised death certification, sustained efforts are needed to strengthen mortality surveillance sites supplemented by VA to support evidence based monitoring and control of RTI mortality.

Indexed as

Population SurveillanceAccidents, TrafficAdolescentAdultAge DistributionCause of DeathFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMotorcyclesPublic PolicySeasonsSex DistributionVietnamWounds and Injuries

Identifiers

PMID22838959
PMCPMC3520687
OpenAlexW1983654307

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.