ArticleIndian journal of palliative care2012
Reporting of "quality of life": a systematic review and quantitative analysis of research publications in palliative care journals.
Article in Indian journal of palliative care, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- A longitudinal study of within-person trajectories in quality of life in patients receiving early palliative care.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2024Article
- The Quality of Life in Patients with Spinal Cord Injury: Assessment and Rehabilitation.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
- Palliative radiotherapy in locally advanced head and neck cancer after failure of induction chemotherapy: comparison of two fractionation schemes.Indian journal of palliative care · 2013Article
- Evidence-based palliative care: role of palliative care journals.Indian journal of palliative care · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
contextPalliative care clinical practice depends upon an evidence-based decision-making process which in turn is based upon current research evidence. One of the most important goals in clinical palliative care is to improve patients' quality of life (QoL).
aimThis study aimed to perform a quantitative analysis of research publications in palliative care journals for reporting characteristics of articles on QoL. SETTINGS AND
designThis was a systematic review of palliative care journals. MATERIALS AND
methodsTwelve palliative care journals were searched for articles with "QoL" in the title of the articles published from 2006 to 2010. The reporting rates of all journals were compared. The selected articles were categorized into assessment and treatment, and subsequently grouped into original and review articles. The original articles were subgrouped into qualitative and quantitative studies, and the review articles were grouped into narrative and systematic reviews. Each subgroup of original article category was further classified according to study designs. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS USED: Descriptive analysis using frequencies and percentiles was done using SPSS for Windows, version 11.5.
resultsThe overall reporting rate among all journals was 1.95% (71/3634), and Indian Journal of Palliative Care (IJPC) had the highest reporting rate of 5.08% (3/59), followed by Palliative Medicine (PM) with 3.71% (20/538), and Palliative and Supportive Care (PSC) with 3.64% (9/247) reporting.
conclusionsThe overall reporting rate for QoL articles in palliative care journals was 1.95% and there were very few randomized clinical trials and systematic reviews found. The study findings indicate further high-quality research to establish an adequate evidence base for QoL.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.