Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22837371›Full record

SynthesisDiabetes care2012

Breast-feeding and childhood-onset type 1 diabetes: a pooled analysis of individual participant data from 43 observational studies.

Chris R Cardwell, Lars C Stene, Johnny Ludvigsson, Joachim Rosenbauer, Ondrej Cinek, Jannet Svensson, Francisco Perez-Bravo, Anjum Memon, Suely G Gimeno, Emma J K Wadsworth and 23 more

Abstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Diabetes care, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 67 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
67citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

67 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Trial
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Are We Ready With Prevention for Type 1 Diabetes?Diabetes/metabolism research and reviews · 2025
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Role of breastfeeding in disease prevention.Microbial biotechnology · 2024
    Review
  20. Article

7 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

33 authors.

Chris R CardwellSchool of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen’s University Belfast, Belfast, UK. c.cardwell@qub.ac.uk
Lars C Stene
Johnny Ludvigsson
Joachim Rosenbauer
Ondrej Cinek
Jannet Svensson
Francisco Perez-Bravo
Anjum Memon
Suely G Gimeno
Emma J K Wadsworth
Elsa S Strotmeyer
Michael J Goldacre
Katja Radon
Lee-Ming Chuang
Roger C Parslow
Amanda Chetwynd
Kyriaki Karavanaki
Girts Brigis
Paolo Pozzilli
Brone Urbonaite
Edith Schober
Gabriele Devoti
Sandra Sipetic
Geir Joner
Constantin Ionescu-Tirgoviste
Carine E de Beaufort
Kirsten Harrild
Victoria Benson
Erkki Savilahti
Anne-Louise Ponsonby
Mona Salem
Samira Rabiei
Chris C Patterson

Funding

EPIDEMIOLOGY OF CHILDHOOD DIABETES IN MIGRANTS AND CHINAR01DK046498 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI LAPORTE, RONALD EDWARD · 1994 to 2000
$180k
GLOBAL EPIDEMIOLOGY OF IDDM--HOST SUSCEPTIBILITYR01DK042316 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI DORMAN, JANICE S · 1990 to 1995
–
NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK046498NIDDK NIH HHS R01-DK-42316NIDDK NIH HHS R01-DK-46498
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo investigate if there is a reduced risk of type 1 diabetes in children breastfed or exclusively breastfed by performing a pooled analysis with adjustment for recognized confounders. RESEARCH DESIGN AND

methodsRelevant studies were identified from literature searches using MEDLINE, Web of Science, and EMBASE. Authors of relevant studies were asked to provide individual participant data or conduct prespecified analyses. Meta-analysis techniques were used to combine odds ratios (ORs) and investigate heterogeneity between studies.

resultsData were available from 43 studies including 9,874 patients with type 1 diabetes. Overall, there was a reduction in the risk of diabetes after exclusive breast-feeding for >2 weeks (20 studies; OR = 0.75, 95% CI 0.64-0.88), the association after exclusive breast-feeding for >3 months was weaker (30 studies; OR = 0.87, 95% CI 0.75-1.00), and no association was observed after (nonexclusive) breast-feeding for >2 weeks (28 studies; OR = 0.93, 95% CI 0.81-1.07) or >3 months (29 studies; OR = 0.88, 95% CI 0.78-1.00). These associations were all subject to marked heterogeneity (I(2) = 58, 76, 54, and 68%, respectively). In studies with lower risk of bias, the reduced risk after exclusive breast-feeding for >2 weeks remained (12 studies; OR = 0.86, 95% CI 0.75-0.99), and heterogeneity was reduced (I(2) = 0%). Adjustments for potential confounders altered these estimates very little.

conclusionsThe pooled analysis suggests weak protective associations between exclusive breast-feeding and type 1 diabetes risk. However, these findings are difficult to interpret because of the marked variation in effect and possible biases (particularly recall bias) inherent in the included studies.

Indexed as

Breast FeedingAdolescentChildChild, PreschoolDiabetes Mellitus, Type 1FemaleHumansMale

Identifiers

PMID22837371
PMCPMC3476923

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.