Trial reportDer Urologe. Ausg. A2012
[Treatment of stress urinary incontinence after radical prostatectomy: adjustable transobturator male system - results of a multicenter prospective observational study].
Trial report in Der Urologe. Ausg. A, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Systematic review and meta-analysis comparing Adjustable Transobturator Male System (ATOMS) and male Readjustment Mechanical External (REMEEX) system for post-prostatectomy incontinence.World journal of urology · 2021Pooled it
- Effectiveness of Adjustable Transobturator Male System (ATOMS) to Treat Male Stress Incontinence: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Advances in therapy · 2019Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Comparison of Different Invasive Devices for the Treatment of Urinary Incontinence after Radical Prostatectomy.Advances in urology · 2022Review
- Reconstructive surgery for male stress urinary incontinence: Experiences using the ATOMS(®) system at a single center.GMS Interdisciplinary plastic and reconstructive surgery DGPW · 2014Article
- First experience with the ATOMS(®) implant, a new treatment option for male urinary incontinence.Central European journal of urology · 2014Article
- [Hydronephrosis after suburethral sling implantation: diagnosis and operative management in men].Der Urologe. Ausg. A · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors at 10 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe adjustable transobturator male system (ATOMS®) is a new method for the treatment of male stress urinary incontinence. This article presents the results of a prospective multicenter observational study with this system. PATIENTS AND
methodsBetween March 2009 and March 2011 a total of 124 patients with persistent stress urinary incontinence after radical prostatectomy received the ATOMS system. Postoperative adjustments via the implanted port chamber were performed after 6 weeks and thereafter when necessary. Postoperative evaluation consisted of medical history, mictionary protocol, 24-h pad tests, 24-h pad counts and sonography.
resultsThe mean age of the patients was 71.2 ± 5.5 years (range 58-85 years). Previous incontinence surgery had been carried out in 36.3% of patients while 34.5% of patients had a previous history of radiation treatment. The mean operation time was 48.3 ± 11.2 min (range 36-116 min) and the mean hospital stay was 3.8 ± 1.2 days (range 2-6 days). No intraoperative urethral or bladder injuries occurred. After removal of the transurethral catheter on the first postoperative day, temporary urinary retention occurred in 3 patients who were conservatively treated. Transient perineal/scrotal pain or dysesthesia was observed in 75 patients (60.5%) and resolved after 3-4 weeks of non-opioid analgesics. There were no perineal infections; however, infections at the port site occurred in 3 patients (2.4%) leading to explantation of the system in all cases. The average number of adjustments to achieve the desired result was 4.3 ± 1.8 (range 2-7). After a mean follow-up of 19.1 ± 2.2 months (range 12-36 months), there was a significant reduction in the mean number of pads/24 h from 8.8 to 1.8 (p<0.001). The overall success rate was 93.8% with 61.6% of the patients being dry and 32.2% of the patients showing improvement.
conclusionsThe results of the study demonstrate the safety and efficacy to date of the ATOMS system for treatment of stress urinary incontinence after radical prostatectomy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.