Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22836278›Full record

GuidelineOsteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA2012

Treatment failure in osteoporosis.

A Diez-Perez, J D Adachi, D Agnusdei, J P Bilezikian, J E Compston, S R Cummings, R Eastell, E F Eriksen, J Gonzalez-Macias, U A Liberman and 5 more

Open access · greenAbstract readPractice Guideline
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Guideline in Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 86 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
86citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
13.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

86 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 222 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Guideline
  3. Guideline
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Guideline
  7. European guidance for the diagnosis and management of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2019
    Guideline
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Four-Year Teriparatide Followed by DenosumabFrontiers in endocrinology · 2021
    Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Comparison of BMD Changes and Bone Formation Marker Levels 3 Years After Bisphosphonate Discontinuation: FLEX and HORIZON-PFT Extension I Trials.Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research · 2019
    Trial
  13. Trial
  14. The risk of subsequent osteoporotic fractures is decreased in subjects experiencing fracture while on denosumab: results from the FREEDOM and FREEDOM Extension studies.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2019
    Trial
  15. Modeling and simulation of bone mineral density in Japanese osteoporosis patients treated with zoledronic acid using tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase 5b, a bone resorption marker.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2018
    Trial
  16. Treatment responses with once-weekly teriparatide therapy for osteoporosis.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2016
    Trial
  17. Response of bone turnover markers to three oral bisphosphonate therapies in postmenopausal osteoporosis: the TRIO study.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2016
    Trial
  18. Impact of oral glucocorticoids on the effectiveness of romosozumab: the multicenter OASIS cohort study.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2026
    Observational
  19. Article
  20. Article

26 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 13 institutions in 9 countries.

A Diez-PerezDepartment of Internal Medicine and Infectious Diseases, Hospital del Mar-IMIM, Autonomous University of Barcelona, RETICEF, Instituto Carlos III, P. Maritim 25-29, 08003 Barcelona, Spain. adiez@parcdesalutmar.cat
J D Adachi
D Agnusdei
J P Bilezikian
J E Compston
S R Cummings
R Eastell
E F Eriksen
J Gonzalez-Macias
U A Liberman
D A Wahl
E Seeman
J A Kanis
C Cooper
IOF CSA Inadequate Responders Working Group
The University of Melbourne · AUUniversity of Oxford · GBBridge University · SSCalifornia Pacific Medical Center · USEli Lilly (Italy) · ITEli Lilly (United States) · USHospital Del Mar · ESOslo University Hospital · NOTel Aviv University · ILUniversidad de Cantabria · ESUniversitat Autònoma de Barcelona · ESUniversity of Cambridge · GBUniversity of Oslo · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

unlabelledGuidelines concerning the definition of failure of therapies used to reduce the risk of fracture are provided.

introductionThis study aims to provide guidelines concerning the definition of failure of therapies used to reduce the risk of fracture.

methodsA working group of the Committee of Scientific Advisors of the International Osteoporosis Foundation was convened to define outcome variables that may assist clinicians in decision making.

resultsIn the face of limited evidence, failure of treatment may be inferred when two or more incident fractures have occurred during treatment, when serial measurements of bone remodelling markers are not suppressed by anti-resorptive therapy and where bone mineral density continues to decrease.

conclusionThe provision of pragmatic criteria to define failure to respond to treatment provides an unmet clinical need and may stimulate research into an important issue.

Indexed as

BiomarkersBone DensityBone Density Conservation AgentsBone RemodelingHumansOsteoporosisOsteoporotic FracturesTreatment FailureTreatment OutcomeBiomarkersBone Density Conservation Agents

Identifiers

PMID22836278
OpenAlexW2111000907

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.