Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22835744›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in structural biology2012

Go hybrid: EM, crystallography, and beyond.

Gabriel C Lander, Helen R Saibil, Eva Nogales

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in structural biology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Journal of applied crystallography · 2015
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Signal transduction: From the atomic age to the post-genomic era.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology · 2014
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Biochemistry. Integrative structural biology.Science (New York, N.Y.) · 2013
    Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Gabriel C LanderLife Science Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA.
Helen R Saibil
Eva Nogales

Funding

Structural Studies of the Eukaryotic Transcription Initiation MachineryR01GM063072 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI NOGALES, EVA · 2001 to 2016
$2.5M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM063072NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM63072Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A mechanistic understanding of the molecular transactions that govern cellular function requires knowledge of the dynamic organization of the macromolecular machines involved in these processes. Structural biologists employ a variety of biophysical methods to study large macromolecular complexes, but no single technique is likely to provide a complete description of the structure-function relationship of all the constituent components. Since structural studies generally only provide snapshots of these dynamic machines as they accomplish their molecular functions, combining data from many methodologies is crucial to our understanding of molecular function.

Indexed as

Crystallography, X-RayHumansMacromolecular SubstancesMicroscopy, ElectronMacromolecular Substances

Identifiers

PMID22835744
PMCPMC3478466

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.