Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22833205›Full record

Trial reportCancer2013

Cost analysis of a patient navigation system to increase screening colonoscopy adherence among urban minorities.

Lina Jandorf, Lauren M Stossel, Julia L Cooperman, Joshua Graff Zivin, Uri Ladabaum, Diana Hall, Linda D Thélémaque, William Redd, Steven H Itzkowitz

Abstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Cancer, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. Review
  15. The Role of Patient Navigation on Colorectal Cancer Screening Completion and Education: a Review of the Literature.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2018
    Review
  16. Observational
  17. Why Wait Until Our Community Gets Cancer?: Exploring CRC Screening Barriers and Facilitators in the Spanish-Speaking Community in North Carolina.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2016
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Lina JandorfDepartment of Oncological Sciences, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY 10029, USA. lina.jandorf@mssm.edu
Lauren M Stossel
Julia L Cooperman
Joshua Graff Zivin
Uri Ladabaum
Diana Hall
Linda D Thélémaque
William Redd
Steven H Itzkowitz

Funding

Patient Navigation for CRC Screening with Low-Income MinoritiesR01CA120658 · NCI · ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI · PI REDD, WILLIAM H · 2007 to 2011
$3.3M
Research and Mentoring in Psychosocial OncologyK05CA108955 · NCI · MOUNT SINAI SCHOOL OF MEDICINE OF NYU · PI REDD, WILLIAM H · 2004 to 2013
$1.5M
NCI NIH HHS K05 CA108955NCI NIH HHS R01 CA120658
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatient navigation (PN) is being used increasingly to help patients complete screening colonoscopy (SC) to prevent colorectal cancer. At their large, urban academic medical center with an open-access endoscopy system, the authors previously demonstrated that PN programs produced a colonoscopy completion rate of 78.5% in a cohort of 503 patients (predominantly African Americans and Latinos with public health insurance). Very little is known about the direct costs of implementing PN programs. The objective of the current study was to perform a detailed cost analysis of PN programs at the authors' institution from an institutional perspective.

methodsIn 2 randomized controlled trials, average-risk patients who were referred for SC by primary care providers were recruited for PN between May 2008 and May 2010. Patients were randomized to 1 of 4 PN groups. The cost of PN and net income to the institution were determined in a cost analysis.

resultsAmong 395 patients who completed colonoscopy, 53.4% underwent SC alone, 30.1% underwent colonoscopy with biopsy, and 16.5% underwent snare polypectomy. Accounting for the average contribution margins of each procedure type, the total revenue was $95,266.00. The total cost of PN was $14,027.30. Net income was $81,238.70. In a model sample of 1000 patients, net incomes for the institutional completion rate (approximately 80%), the historic PN program (approximately 65%), and the national average (approximately 50%) were compared. The current PN program generated additional net incomes of $35,035.50 and $44,956.00, respectively.

conclusionsPN among minority patients with mostly public health insurance generated additional income to the institution, mainly because of increased colonoscopy completion rates.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overBlack or African AmericanCarcinomaColonoscopyColorectal NeoplasmsCosts and Cost AnalysisFemaleHispanic or LatinoHumansMaleMass ScreeningMiddle AgedMinority GroupsOccult BloodPatient Compliance

Identifiers

PMID22833205
PMCPMC3492525

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.