Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22833170›Full record

ReviewCellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS2012

Molecular mechanisms of desiccation tolerance in resurrection plants.

Tsanko S Gechev, Challabathula Dinakar, Maria Benina, Valentina Toneva, Dorothea Bartels

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 68 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
68citing papers in PubMed
14.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

68 citing papers in PubMed, 170 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. The promise of resurrection plants in enhancing crop tolerance to water scarcity.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2025
    Review
  3. Metabolite Profiling of the Resurrection GrassPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. How bacteria actively use passive physics to make biofilms.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Desiccation Tolerance inPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  12. Overexpression ofFrontiers in plant science · 2022
    Article
  13. Adaptative Mechanisms of HalophyticFrontiers in plant science · 2022
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Systems biology of resurrection plants.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2021
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Characterizing the Leaf Transcriptome ofFrontiers in genetics · 2021
    Article

8 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Tsanko S GechevDepartment of Plant Physiology and Plant Molecular Biology, University of Plovdiv, Bulgaria. tsangech@uni-plovdiv.bg
Challabathula Dinakar
Maria Benina
Valentina Toneva
Dorothea Bartels
Center of Plant Systems Biology and Biotechnology · BGUniversity of Bonn · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Resurrection plants are a small but diverse group of land plants characterized by their tolerance to extreme drought or desiccation. They have the unique ability to survive months to years without water, lose most of the free water in their vegetative tissues, fall into anabiosis, and, upon rewatering, quickly regain normal activity. Thus, they are fundamentally different from other drought-surviving plants such as succulents or ephemerals, which cope with drought by maintaining higher steady state water potential or via a short life cycle, respectively. This review describes the unique physiological and molecular adaptations of resurrection plants enabling them to withstand long periods of desiccation. The recent transcriptome analysis of Craterostigma plantagineum and Haberlea rhodopensis under drought, desiccation, and subsequent rehydration revealed common genetic pathways with other desiccation-tolerant species as well as unique genes that might contribute to the outstanding desiccation tolerance of the two resurrection species. While some of the molecular responses appear to be common for both drought stress and desiccation, resurrection plants also possess genes that are highly induced or repressed during desiccation with no apparent sequence homologies to genes of other species. Thus, resurrection plants are potential sources for gene discovery. Further proteome and metabolome analyses of the resurrection plants contributed to a better understanding of molecular mechanisms that are involved in surviving severe water loss. Understanding the cellular mechanisms of desiccation tolerance in this unique group of plants may enable future molecular improvement of drought tolerance in crop plants.

Indexed as

Adaptation, PhysiologicalDroughtsCraterostigmaDesiccationMagnoliopsidaPlant Physiological PhenomenaProteomeSignal TransductionStress, PhysiologicalTranscription FactorsTranscriptomeWaterProteomeTranscription FactorsWater

Identifiers

PMID22833170
PMCPMC11114980
OpenAlexW2080373135

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.