Trial reportLung cancer (Amsterdam, Netherlands)2012
Cediranib in patients with malignant mesothelioma: a phase II trial of the University of Chicago Phase II Consortium.
Trial report in Lung cancer (Amsterdam, Netherlands), 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00309946 (Phase II Study of AZD2171), which is not on this map. Cited by 28 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Phase II Study of AZD2171 (NSC#732208) in Patients With Malignant Mesothelioma
Who cites it
28 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Systematic review of response rates of sarcomatoid malignant pleural mesotheliomas in clinical trials.Lung cancer (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2014Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Reprogramming the tumor microenvironment in mesothelioma: from immune suppression to therapeutic opportunity.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Review
- Recent Advances in Mesothelioma Treatment: Immunotherapy, Advanced Cell Therapy, and Other Innovative Therapeutic Modalities.Cancers · 2025Review
- The past, present, and future of targeted therapeutic approaches in patients with diffuse pleural mesotheliomas.Journal of cancer metastasis and treatment · 2023Article
- Posterior Reversible Encephalopathy Syndrome after Lenvatinib Therapy in a Patient with Olfactory Neuroblastoma.Brain sciences · 2022Article
- Venous Thromboembolism in Cancer Patients Undergoing Chemotherapy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Novel and Promising Systemic Treatment Approaches in Mesothelioma.Current treatment options in oncology · 2021Review
- A Glimpse in the Future of Malignant Mesothelioma Treatment.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2021Review
- Chemotherapy options versus "novel" therapies: how should we treat patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma.Translational lung cancer research · 2020Review
- Antiangiogeneic Strategies in Mesothelioma.Frontiers in oncology · 2020Review
- Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma: Is Tailoring the Second-Line Therapy Really "Raising the Bar?"Current treatment options in oncology · 2019Review
- Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma: State-of-the-Art on Current Therapies and Promises for the Future.Frontiers in oncology · 2019Review
- Review
- Targeting the Hippo Pathway Is a New Potential Therapeutic Modality for Malignant Mesothelioma.Cancers · 2018Review
- Article
- Novel systemic therapy against malignant pleural mesothelioma.Translational lung cancer research · 2017Review
- Anti-Angiogenic Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors and Reversible Posterior Leukoencephalopathy Syndrome: Could Hypomagnesaemia Be the Trigger?Drug safety · 2017Review
- Spotlight on bevacizumab and its potential in the treatment of malignant pleural mesothelioma: the evidence to date.OncoTargets and therapy · 2017Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionMalignant mesothelioma (MM) is an aggressive disease with limited therapeutic options. In preclinical models, vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) stimulates MM proliferation. In MM patients, higher plasma VEGF levels correlate inversely with survival. Cediranib is an orally administered tyrosine kinase inhibitor of VEGF receptors-1, -2, and -3.
methodsWe conducted a multi-center phase II trial of cediranib in patients with unresectable, histologically-confirmed MM who had received ≤1 prior regimen of chemotherapy. The primary endpoint was objective response rate. Initial cediranib dosing was 45 mg daily during a 28-day cycle. Due to substantial toxicity, the starting dose was subsequently lowered to 30 mg daily.
resultsFifty-one patients enrolled at 9 centers; 50 were evaluable for response. Partial responses were observed in 10% of patients; stable disease was seen in 34%. Disease control (PR+SD) was higher at the 45 mg cediranib dose level (67% vs. 34%, p=0.04). Median progression-free survival was 1.8 months (95% CI 0.1, 14.2); median overall survival (OS) was 4.4 months (95% CI 0.9, 41.7). The 1-year survival rate was 15%. Grade 3/4 toxicities were more frequent in the 45 mg dose level group (87% vs. 43%, p=0.002). These included fatigue, hypertension, pulmonary embolism, angioedema, and reversible posterior leukoencephalopathy. Median OS was superior in patients who developed ≥grade 3 hypertension (8.5 vs. 4.1 months, p=0.024).
conclusionThis trial did not meet its pre-specified response endpoint. A higher cediranib dose level was associated with improved disease control, but this dose was poorly tolerated.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.