Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22831987›Full record

Trial reportLung cancer (Amsterdam, Netherlands)2012

Cediranib in patients with malignant mesothelioma: a phase II trial of the University of Chicago Phase II Consortium.

Nicholas P Campbell, Rangesh Kunnavakkam, Natasha Leighl, Mark D Vincent, David R Gandara, Marianna Koczywas, Barbara J Gitlitz, Edem Agamah, Sachdev P Thomas, Walter M Stadler and 2 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Lung cancer (Amsterdam, Netherlands), 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00309946 (Phase II Study of AZD2171), which is not on this map. Cited by 28 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00309946 phase2completednot on this map

Phase II Study of AZD2171 (NSC#732208) in Patients With Malignant Mesothelioma

TypeinterventionalSponsorNational Cancer Institute (NCI)Ran2005 to 2010Enrolled51ConditionsAdvanced Malignant Mesothelioma, Epithelial Mesothelioma, Localized Malignant Mesothelioma, Recurrent Malignant MesotheliomaArmscediranib maleate
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Novel and Promising Systemic Treatment Approaches in Mesothelioma.Current treatment options in oncology · 2021
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Antiangiogeneic Strategies in Mesothelioma.Frontiers in oncology · 2020
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Novel systemic therapy against malignant pleural mesothelioma.Translational lung cancer research · 2017
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Nicholas P CampbellSection of Hematology/Oncology, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637, USA.
Rangesh Kunnavakkam
Natasha Leighl
Mark D Vincent
David R Gandara
Marianna Koczywas
Barbara J Gitlitz
Edem Agamah
Sachdev P Thomas
Walter M Stadler
Everett E Vokes
Hedy L Kindler

Funding

Staff InvestigatorsP30CA093373 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA DAVIS · PI Laura Marcu · 2002 to 2026
$84.9M
NCI NIH HHS N01 CM062201NCI NIH HHS N01 CM062209NCI NIH HHS N01-CM-62201NCI NIH HHS N01-CM-62209NCI NIH HHS P30 CA093373
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionMalignant mesothelioma (MM) is an aggressive disease with limited therapeutic options. In preclinical models, vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) stimulates MM proliferation. In MM patients, higher plasma VEGF levels correlate inversely with survival. Cediranib is an orally administered tyrosine kinase inhibitor of VEGF receptors-1, -2, and -3.

methodsWe conducted a multi-center phase II trial of cediranib in patients with unresectable, histologically-confirmed MM who had received ≤1 prior regimen of chemotherapy. The primary endpoint was objective response rate. Initial cediranib dosing was 45 mg daily during a 28-day cycle. Due to substantial toxicity, the starting dose was subsequently lowered to 30 mg daily.

resultsFifty-one patients enrolled at 9 centers; 50 were evaluable for response. Partial responses were observed in 10% of patients; stable disease was seen in 34%. Disease control (PR+SD) was higher at the 45 mg cediranib dose level (67% vs. 34%, p=0.04). Median progression-free survival was 1.8 months (95% CI 0.1, 14.2); median overall survival (OS) was 4.4 months (95% CI 0.9, 41.7). The 1-year survival rate was 15%. Grade 3/4 toxicities were more frequent in the 45 mg dose level group (87% vs. 43%, p=0.002). These included fatigue, hypertension, pulmonary embolism, angioedema, and reversible posterior leukoencephalopathy. Median OS was superior in patients who developed ≥grade 3 hypertension (8.5 vs. 4.1 months, p=0.024).

conclusionThis trial did not meet its pre-specified response endpoint. A higher cediranib dose level was associated with improved disease control, but this dose was poorly tolerated.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntineoplastic AgentsFemaleHumansIndolesMaleMesotheliomaMiddle AgedProtein Kinase InhibitorsQuinazolinesTreatment OutcomeAntineoplastic AgentscediranibIndolesProtein Kinase InhibitorsQuinazolines

Identifiers

PMID22831987
PMCPMC4319647

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.