IRB chairs' perspectives on genotype-driven research recruitment.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

1. How to communicate and what to disclose to participants in a recall-by-genotype research approach: a multistep empirical study.Journal of community genetics · 2024
   Article
2. Participant perspective on the recall-by-genotype research approach: a mixed-method embedded study with participants of the CHRIS study.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2023
   Article
3. Ethical, legal and social/societal implications (ELSI) of recall-by-genotype (RbG) and genotype-driven-research (GDR) approaches: a scoping review.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2022
   Article
4. Balancing scientific interests and the rights of participants in designing a recall by genotype study.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2021
   Article
5. Impact of Next Generation Sequencing on the Organization and Funding of Returning Research Results: Survey of Canadian Research Ethics Boards Members.PloS one · 2016
   Article
6. Those Responsible for Approving Research Studies Have Poor Knowledge of Research Study Design: a Knowledge Assessment of Institutional Review Board Members.Acta informatica medica : AIM : journal of the Society for Medical Informatics of Bosnia & Herzegovina : casopis Drustva za medicinsku informatiku BiH · 2015
   Article
7. Canadian Research Ethics Board Leadership Attitudes to the Return of Genetic Research Results to Individuals and Their Families.The Journal of law, medicine & ethics : a journal of the American Society of Law, Medicine & Ethics · 2015
   Article
8. Return of Genetic Research Results to Participants and Families: IRB Perspectives and Roles.The Journal of law, medicine & ethics : a journal of the American Society of Law, Medicine & Ethics · 2015
   Article
9. Genotype-driven recruitment: a strategy whose time has come?BMC medical genomics · 2013
   Article
10. Recommendations for ethical approaches to genotype-driven research recruitment.Human genetics · 2012
    Article
11. Research participants' perspectives on genotype-driven research recruitment.Journal of empirical research on human research ethics : JERHRE · 2011
    Article

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Funding

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as