Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22829432›Full record

ArticlePsychopharmacology2013

Common influences of non-competitive NMDA receptor antagonists on the consolidation and reconsolidation of cocaine-cue memory.

Yasaman Alaghband, John F Marshall

Open access · greenAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Psychopharmacology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Molecular and circuit mechanisms regulating cocaine memory.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2020
    Review
  6. Sobriety and Satiety: Is NAD+ the Answer?Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Infralimbic GluN2A-Containing NMDA Receptors Modulate Reconsolidation of Cocaine Self-Administration Memory.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2017
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Memory reconsolidation in aversive and appetitive settings.Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience · 2013
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yasaman AlaghbandDepartment of Neurobiology and Behavior, Center for the Neurobiology of Learning and Memory, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA 92697, USA.
John F Marshall
University of California, Irvine · US

Funding

ERK Signaling, Neural Circuits and Reconsolidation of Cocaine-Cue MemoriesR01DA021807 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI MARSHALL, JOHN FOSTER · 2007 to 2011
$1.6M
NIDA NIH HHS DA 021807NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA021807
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

rationaleEnvironmental stimuli or contexts previously associated with rewarding drugs contribute importantly to relapse among addicts, and research has focused on neurobiological processes maintaining those memories. Much research shows contributions of cell surface receptors and intracellular signaling pathways in maintaining associations between rewarding drugs (e.g., cocaine) and concurrent cues/contexts; these memories can be degraded at the time of their retrieval through reconsolidation interference. Much less studied is the consolidation of drug-cue memories during their acquisition.

objectiveThe present experiments use the cocaine-conditioned place preference (CPP) paradigm in rats to directly compare, in a consistent setting, the effects of N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) glutamate receptor antagonists MK-801 and memantine on the consolidation and reconsolidation of cocaine-cue memories.

methodsFor the consolidation studies, animals were systemically administered MK-801 or memantine immediately following training sessions. To investigate the effects of these NMDA receptor antagonists on the retention of previously established cocaine-cue memories, animals were systemically administered MK-801 or memantine immediately after memory retrieval.

resultsAnimals given either NMDA receptor antagonist immediately following training sessions did not establish a preference for the cocaine-paired compartment. Post-retrieval administration of either NMDA receptor antagonist attenuated the animals' preference for the cocaine-paired compartment. Furthermore, animals given NMDA receptor antagonists post-retrieval showed a blunted response to cocaine-primed reinstatement.

conclusionsUsing two distinct NMDA receptor antagonists in a common setting, these findings demonstrate that NMDA receptor-dependent processes contribute both to the consolidation and reconsolidation of cocaine-cue memories, and they point to the potential utility of treatments that interfere with drug-cue memory reconsolidation.

Indexed as

AnimalsCocaineConditioning, PsychologicalCuesDizocilpine MaleateExcitatory Amino Acid AntagonistsMaleMemantineMemoryRatsRats, Sprague-DawleyReceptors, N-Methyl-D-AspartateRewardCocaineDizocilpine MaleateExcitatory Amino Acid AntagonistsMemantineReceptors, N-Methyl-D-Aspartate

Identifiers

PMID22829432
PMCPMC3917839
OpenAlexW2155603731

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.