ArticleRheumatology international2013
Medical students' attitude towards rheumatology training at foundation years' level in the UK and rationale behind the students' choice: results from a national survey.
Article in Rheumatology international, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Would You Consider Becoming a Rheumatologist? A Survey Regarding the Attractiveness of Rheumatology as a Career Among Moroccan Medical Students.Mediterranean journal of rheumatology · 2023Article
- To be or not to be rheumatologist: survey among Belgian medical students and internal medicine trainees: what do certified rheumatologists think about the current rheumatology training program?Clinical rheumatology · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The aims are to assess whether medical students are interested in rheumatology as a training post during post-medical-school and prior to specialty training that is covered by foundation years (FY) training in the UK, to determine the time spent in the undergraduate training in rheumatology and whether the desire for musculoskeletal (MsK) medicine training (rheumatology and orthopaedics taken together) is enhanced during FY training and to analyse the rationale behind their choice for rheumatology alone or combined with orthopaedics. An online questionnaire was distributed to all 31 UK medical schools, addressed to fourth-, fifth- and sixth-year medical students. The questionnaire was completed by 256 students from 11 of 31 medical schools existed in the UK in 2009. Most respondents (n = 156; 60.9 %) received 3 weeks (96 h) exposure to rheumatology, whilst one-fifth (n = 53; 20.7 %) had received no exposure in rheumatology. A total of 122 students of the 256 that responded (47.6 %) would like to do rheumatology as part of their training and 116 (45.3 %) would like to have more posts available in rheumatology. However, when asked to choose 6 specialties, out of 21, which would be most useful for post-university training, rheumatology was amongst the bottom three, attracting only 9.4 % of respondent students. A total of 68 of 256 (26.5 %) students, however, expressed a desire for MsK medicine: 44/256 (17.1 %) for orthopaedics and 24/256 (9.4 %) for rheumatology. From a total of 49 of 256 (19.1 %) open-ended responses obtained, 25 (51 %) were from those medical students willing to have exposure in MsK medicine: 15 of 44 (34 %) willing to have orthopaedics and 10 of 24 (41.6 %) willing to have rheumatology. Analysis of the responses revealed that it is mostly the specialty choice that guides towards specialty training. One in five of the medical students responded to had received (actual or perceived) no exposure to rheumatology during their undergraduate years. Career choice that derived mostly from undergraduate exposure is the driving force behind medical students' choice for foundation year training.
Indexed as
Identifiers
22829415What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.