ReviewZeitschrift fur Gerontologie und Geriatrie2012
[New oral anticoagulants for the prevention of stroke. Open questions in geriatric patients].
Review in Zeitschrift fur Gerontologie und Geriatrie, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- [Anticoagulation in geriatric patients with atrial fibrillation : With what and for whom no more?]Herz · 2018Review
- [Oral anticoagulation using coumarins - an update].Wiener medizinische Wochenschrift (1946) · 2018Review
- [New oral anticoagulants for prophylaxis of stroke : Results of an expert conference on practical use in geriatric patients].Zeitschrift fur Gerontologie und Geriatrie · 2016Article
- [New oral anticoagulants: who really needs them?].Der Internist · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
New oral anticoagulants for the prevention of stroke in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation have been available for a few months, among them the reversible direct thrombin inhibitor dabigatran and the factor Xa antagonist rivaroxaban. These drugs are considered by some as a superior alternative to vitamin K antagonists. The lack of necessity for regular monitoring is advertised as a major advantage. Although atrial fibrillation is a disease with increasing prevalence with higher age, the suitability of the new drugs has not been extensively studied in multimorbid geriatric patients. Since dabigatran is contraindicated in patients with renal insufficiency, only the lower of the two approved dosages can usually be prescribed in elderly patients. For the lower dosage, however, no superiority in prevention of stroke has been documented but merely a reduction in major bleeding rates, although at a high number needed to treat. The requirement for a twice-daily dosage regimen, the lack of an anticoagulation monitoring option, the relatively short duration of action and the lack of an antidote may even prove to be crucial disadvantages in clinical practice in comparison to vitamin K antagonists. Until more data are available, the new oral anticoagulants should be prescribed with caution in geriatric patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.