Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22828994›Full record

ReviewZeitschrift fur Gerontologie und Geriatrie2012

[New oral anticoagulants for the prevention of stroke. Open questions in geriatric patients].

H K Berthold

Abstract readEnglish AbstractReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Zeitschrift fur Gerontologie und Geriatrie, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. [Oral anticoagulation using coumarins - an update].Wiener medizinische Wochenschrift (1946) · 2018
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

H K BertholdForschungsgruppe Geriatrie, Evangelisches Geriatriezentrum Berlin, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Reinickendorfer Str. 61, 13347, Berlin, Deutschland. heiner.berthold@charite.de
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

New oral anticoagulants for the prevention of stroke in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation have been available for a few months, among them the reversible direct thrombin inhibitor dabigatran and the factor Xa antagonist rivaroxaban. These drugs are considered by some as a superior alternative to vitamin K antagonists. The lack of necessity for regular monitoring is advertised as a major advantage. Although atrial fibrillation is a disease with increasing prevalence with higher age, the suitability of the new drugs has not been extensively studied in multimorbid geriatric patients. Since dabigatran is contraindicated in patients with renal insufficiency, only the lower of the two approved dosages can usually be prescribed in elderly patients. For the lower dosage, however, no superiority in prevention of stroke has been documented but merely a reduction in major bleeding rates, although at a high number needed to treat. The requirement for a twice-daily dosage regimen, the lack of an anticoagulation monitoring option, the relatively short duration of action and the lack of an antidote may even prove to be crucial disadvantages in clinical practice in comparison to vitamin K antagonists. Until more data are available, the new oral anticoagulants should be prescribed with caution in geriatric patients.

Indexed as

Administration, OralAgedAnticoagulantsAntithrombinsBenzimidazolesbeta-AlanineDabigatranEvidence-Based MedicineFemaleHumansMorpholinesRivaroxabanStrokeThiophenesAnticoagulantsAntithrombinsBenzimidazolesbeta-AlanineDabigatranMorpholinesRivaroxabanThiophenes

Identifiers

PMID22828994
OpenAlexW206795776

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.