Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22828954›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of epidemiology2012

Use of glucosamine and chondroitin in relation to mortality.

Griffith A Bell, Elizabeth D Kantor, Johanna W Lampe, Danny D Shen, Emily White

Open access · greenAbstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of epidemiology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 96 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Nutraceutical and Dietary Strategies for Up-Regulating Macroautophagy.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Griffith A BellCancer Prevention Program, The Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA 98109, USA. gabell@fhcrc.org
Elizabeth D Kantor
Johanna W Lampe
Danny D Shen
Emily White
University of Washington · USCape Town HVTN Immunology Laboratory / Hutchinson Centre Research Institute of South Africa · ZAFred Hutch Cancer Center · US

Funding

Translational Bioimaging Core Shared ResourceP30CA015704 · NCI · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI Marian Esvelt · 1985 to 2026
$296.4M
Cancer Prevention Trng-Nutrition, Exercise &GeneticsR25CA094880 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI WHITE, EMILY · 2002 to 2016
$7.3M
Cohort Study of Glucosamine and Chondroitin Supplement Use and Cancer RiskR01CA142545 · NCI · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI WHITE, EMILY · 2010 to 2012
$910k
Established Investigator Award Anti-Inflammatory Exposures in Cancer PreventionK05CA154337 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI WHITE, EMILY · 2011 to 2015
$637k
NCI NIH HHS K05 CA154337NCI NIH HHS K05-CA154337NCI NIH HHS P30 CA015704NCI NIH HHS R01 CA142545NCI NIH HHS R01-CA142545NCI NIH HHS R25 CA094880NCI NIH HHS R25-CA94880
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Glucosamine and chondroitin are products commonly used by older adults in the US and Europe. There is limited evidence that they have anti-inflammatory properties, which could provide risk reduction of several diseases. However, data on their long-term health effects is lacking. To evaluate whether use of glucosamine and chondroitin are associated with cause-specific and total mortality. Participants (n = 77,510) were members of a cohort study of Washington State (US) residents aged 50-76 years who entered the cohort in 2000-2002 by completing a baseline questionnaire that included questions on glucosamine and chondroitin use. Participants were followed for mortality through 2008 (n = 5,362 deaths). Hazard ratios (HR) for death adjusted for multiple covariates were estimated using Cox models. Current (baseline) glucosamine and chondroitin use were associated with a decreased risk of total mortality compared to never use. The adjusted HR associated with current use of glucosamine (with or without chondroitin) was 0.82 (95 % CI 0.75-0.90) and 0.86 (95 % CI 0.78-0.96) for chondroitin (included in two-thirds of glucosamine supplements). Current use of glucosamine was associated with a significant decreased risk of death from cancer (HR 0.87 95 % CI 0.76-0.98) and with a large risk reduction for death from respiratory diseases (HR 0.59 95 % CI 0.41-0.83). Use of glucosamine with or without chondroitin was associated with reduced total mortality and with reductions of several broad causes of death. Although bias cannot be ruled out, these results suggest that glucosamine may provide some mortality benefit.

Indexed as

MortalityAgedAnti-Inflammatory AgentsCause of DeathChondroitinDietary SupplementsFemaleFollow-Up StudiesGlucosamineHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasmsProportional Hazards ModelsProspective StudiesRisk FactorsAnti-Inflammatory AgentsChondroitinGlucosamine

Identifiers

PMID22828954
PMCPMC3557824
OpenAlexW2020116183

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.